The purpose of the study was the analysis of the growth dynamics of power indicators of athletes-bodybuilders at the stage of specialized basic training. Materials and methods. The study was conducted from March to the end of June (4 months) 2021. It involved 60 athletes aged from 18 to 19 years. Three research groups were formed, 20 athletes in each. These groups of athletes were divided by the usual sample method and by age. Qualification and anthropometric characteristics did not differ significantly. The only difference was in the proposed training programs. Theoretical analysis of scientific and methodological literature was carried out. Test control method for determining the maximum muscle strength of athletes to assess the initial level of muscle strength development in the surveyed contingent and determine the characteristics of its dynamics, was used. The obtained data were used to calculate the indicators of the value of the training load of athletes. In addition, method for quantitative assessment of athletes' physical load was used. The mathematical processing of research results was carried out using the software packages IBM SPSS Statistics 20. Results and discussion. The research results indicate that the values of the training loads indicators of bodybuilders and the nature of their changes in conditions of the same level of athletes' fitness and the structure of the training session depend on the characteristics of the selected training means (training programs). The analysis of the results obtained shows that under the conditions of the second variant of the training program, the indicators of the working mass of the athletes' equipment change more significantly during the entire research period. A similar tendency is observed when monitoring the load volume indicators, despite the fact that the most significant increase in this indicator among bodybuilders when performing formative exercises was obtained under the conditions of using the third variant of the training program, using the “premature fatigue” method. Conclusion. The growth rates of the strength capabilities of the main muscle groups turned out to be the highest among bodybuilders of the second main group due to the long-term use of the “premature fatigue” method. When performing exercises of a formative nature, the growth rate of strength capabilities was 30.9% (p <0.05), while when performing exercises of a basic nature, such an increase was three times less (by 10.5%, p <0.05)

Keywords: premature fatigue, bodybuilding, training programs, strength indicators, basic exercises, formative exercises

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 257K

1. Platonov VN The system of training athletes in the Olympic sport. General theory and its practical applications. K: Olympic Literature; 2015. 680 p.
2. Chernozub A. Dinamics of the condition of autonomic heart rhythm regulation in athletic trainings. Eur Int J Sci Technol. 2013;2(6): 17–22.
3. Dvorkin LS Power single combats. Athleticism, bodybuilding, powerlifting, kettlebell lifting. RnD: Phoenix; 2003. 383 p.
4. Oleshko VG. Preparation of athletes in power sports. K: "DIA"; 2011. 442 p.
5. Knyazev NV Influence of individual correction of the training load on morphometric and power indicators during recreational bodybuilding. Physical culture: upbringing, education, training. 2005;4:62–63.
6. Usychenko VV Characteristics of anthropometric indicators of outstanding athletes specializing in bodybuilding. Materials of the International Scientific Conference of Postgraduates. Ed by V Manolaki. Chisinau Moldova; 2009. 2009. p. 326-330.
7. Lapach SN, Babich PN, Chubenko AV. Statistical methods in biomedical research using Exel. K: MORION; 2001. 408 p.
8. Slavityak OS. Special features of the structure of trenuvalnyh take young bodybuilders at the stage of cob training. Bulletin of the Chernigiv National Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogical Sciences, Physical Education and Sport". 2012;102(2):259-262.
9. Matveev LP Fundamentals of the general theory of sport and the system of training athletes. K: Olympic Literature; 1999. 320 p.
10. Ahtiainen JP, Hakkinen K. Strength athletes are capable to produce greater muscle activation and neural fatigue during high-intensity resistance exercise than nonathletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(4):1129-1134. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19528869. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181aa1b72
11. Kozina Zh, Repko O, Ionova O, Boychuk Yu, Korobeinikov V. Mathematical basis for the integral development of strength, speed and endurance in sports with complex manifestation of physical qualities. J Physical Educ Sport. 2016;16(1):789-792
12. Tikhorsky OA, Jim VYu. Pobudova of the initial-trenuvular process of high-grade body-dervies in the magal mesocycle of the magal period. Naukovy chasopis (Kyiv). 2017;9(91):107-113.
13. Kraemer RR, Castracane VD. Endocrine alterations from concentric vs. eccentric muscle actions: a brief review. Metabolism. 2015;64(2):190–201. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25467839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2014.10.024
14. Hatfield FK Comprehensive guidance on the development of strength. Krasnoyarsk: Rotaprint; 1992. 288 p.
15. Helms ER, Fitschen PJ, Aragon AA, Cronin J, Schoenfeld BJ. Recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: resistance and cardiovascular training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015;55(3):164–178.
16. Jones TW, Howatson G, Russell M, French DN. Performance and neuromuscular adaptations following differing ratios of concurrent strength and endurance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(12):3342–3351. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24270456. doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b2cf39