ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 17 of 68
Up
УЖМБС 2021, 6(5): 116–126
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs06.05.116
Experimental Medicine and Morphology

Morphological Aspects of Reparative Bone Tissue Regeneration under the Influence of Antitumor Chemotherapy

Riabenko T. V., Korenkov O. V., Kovaliuk T. M.
Abstract

The occurrence of fractures in the development of cancer in the body is due to changes in bone metabolism in the form of osteoporosis and metastatic bone damage. Their appearance leads to the postponement or cessation of treatment of cancer, which affects the life expectancy of such patients and the chances of recovery. Antitumor chemotherapy, as one of the main methods of cancer treatment, is prescribed for long-term courses and affects the healing of fractures. However, according to the literature, the effect of antitumor chemotherapeutics on reparative regeneration is poorly understood today. The purpose of the work is to study the morphological features of reparative osteogenesis under the influence of antitumor chemotherapy. Materials and methods. The study was performed on 96 white laboratory male rats 7 months of age weighing 230±10 g. All animals had a perforated defect with a diameter of 2 mm spherical cutter to the bone marrow canal in the middle third of the femoral shaft. Animals were divided into control (n = 24, without chemotherapy) and three experimental groups (I, II, III, n = 72), which after injury and every 21 days of the study were administered intraperitoneal anticancer chemotherapeutics: I (n = 24) – doxorubicin (60 mg / m²), II (n = 24) – 5-fluorouracil (600 mg / m²), III (n = 24) – methotrexate (40 mg / m²). On the 15th, 30th, 45th, 60th days after injury, the animals were removed from the experiment, followed by removal of the injured long tubular bones. Histological preparations stained with hematoxylin-eosin, followed by their morphometry, scanning electron microscopy with the method of X-ray energy dispersion spectroscopy, immunohistochemical examination were performed. Results and discussion. Antitumor chemotherapeutics causes delayed callus formation, which is manifested by an increase in the area of connective and reticulofibrous bone tissue in the regenerate, along with the slow formation of lamellar bone tissue. Chemotherapy leads to disorders of phosphorus-calcium metabolism both in the regenerate and in the maternal bone in the form of reducing the intensity of mineralization of the newly formed bone matrix and slowing down the remodeling activity of the maternal bone. Chemotherapy is accompanied by an increase in the expression of the bone resorption marker cathepsin K and a decrease in the expression of the osteopontin bone marker, which indicates a delay in the formation of regenerate in the area of injury and a decrease in the rate of reparative regeneration. Conclusion. The most pronounced delay in the processes of remodeling of bone regenerate was found with the use of doxorubicin and methotrexate, while 5-fluorouracil showed less inhibitory effect on these processes

Keywords: bone regenerate, antitumor chemotherapeutics, morphometry, scanning microscopy, spectral analysis, immunohistochemistry

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 567K

References
  1. Whitburn J, Edwards CM. Metabolism in the Tumour-Bone Microenvironment. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2021; 2021: 1-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34319488. doi: 10.1007/s11914-021-00695-7
  2. Tsuzuki S, Park SH, Eber MR, Peters CM, Shiozawa Y. Skeletal complications in cancer patients with bone metastases. Int J Urol. 2016; 23(10): 825-832. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488133. PMCID: PMC5718365. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13170
  3. Fornetti J, Welm AL, Stewart SA. Understanding the Bone in Cancer Metastasis. J Bone Miner Res. 2018; 33(12): 2099-2113. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30476357. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3618
  4. Willeumier JJ, van der Linden YM, van de Sande MAJ, Dijkstra PDS. Treatment of pathological fractures of the long bones. EFORT Open Rev. 2016; 1(5): 136–145. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28461940. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5367617. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000008
  5. Kimura T. Multidisciplinary Approach for Bone Metastasis: A Review. Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10(6): 156. HTTPS://WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/29795015. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6025143. doi: 10.3390/cancers10060156
  6. Shupp AB, Kolb AD, Mukhopadhyay D, Bussard KM. Cancer metastases to bone: concepts, mechanisms, and interactions with bone osteoblasts. Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10(6): 182. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867053. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6025347. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10060182
  7. Rachner TD, Hofbauer LC, Göbel A. Bone Metabolism. In: Cancer. Central Nervous System Metastases. Springer, Cham; 2020. p. 503-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42958-4_36
  8. Saad F, Lipton A, Cook R, Chen YM, Smith M, Coleman R. Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer. 2007; 110(8): 1860-1867. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22991
  9. Bedatsova L, Drake MT. The skeletal impact of cancer therapies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 85(6): 1161-1168. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723928. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6533456. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13866
  10. Rosen H.N. Drugs that affect bone metabolism. 2016. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/drugs-that-affect-bone-metabolism
  11. Quach JM, Askmyr M, Jovic T, Baker EK, Walsh NC, Harrison SJ, et al. Myelosuppressive therapies significantly increase pro‐inflammatory cytokines and directly cause bone loss. J Bone Miner Res. 2015; 30(5): 886-897. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25418357. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2415
  12. Rana T, Chakrabarti A, Freeman M, Biswas S. Doxorubicin-Mediated Bone Loss in Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Is Driven by an Interplay between Oxidative Stress and Induction of TGFβ. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(10): 78043. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205081. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3813496. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078043
  13. Pountos I, Giannoudis PV. Effect of methotrexate on bone and wound healing. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017; 16(5): 535–545. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28332422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2017.1310839
  14. Robin F, Cadiou S, Albert JD, Bart G, Coiffier G, Guggenbuhl P. Methotrexate osteopathy: five cases and systematic literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2021; 32: 225–232. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33128074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05664-x
  15. Raghu Nadhanan R, Abimosleh SM, Su YW, Howarth GS, Xian CJ. Dietary emu oil supplementation suppresses 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy-induced inflammation, osteoclast formation, and bone loss. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 302(11): 1440-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436700. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00587.2011
  16. Fan C, Georgiou KR, Morris HA, McKinnon RA, Keefe DMK, Howe PR, et al. Combination breast cancer chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide damages bone and bone marrow in a female rat model. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 165: 41–51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28550626. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4308-3