ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 51 of 61
Up
УЖМБС 2018, 3(5): 275–278
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs03.05.275
View of a problem

Features of Diagnosis and Treatment of Coronary Syndrome X

Tsiganenko I. V., Ovcharenko L. K.
Abstract

It is known that now in 10-20% of patients, who are undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography, coronary arteries are intact, but clinically, they have appropriate complaints and need medical help. There are also difficulties in selecting the optimal antianginal drugs for such patients because the majority cases they are ineffective. So, the purpose of the study was to consider the issue of diagnosis and treatment of coronary syndrome X. Material and methods. We used the following methods for the diagnosis of microvascular angina: - The method of introduction of adenosine in coronary arteries allowed us to determine the rate of bleeding when connecting an ultrasound sensor. This diagnostic method detected changes in the blood flow with high probability. - MRT of heart helped determine the adequacy of blood flow precisely in the subendocardial region. - Single-photon emission computer tomography was performed together with bicycle ergometry or pharmacological tests. When the heart reached the rate with signs of ischemia, the radioisotope substance was introduced. After an hour, a computer tomography was performed to assess violations of perfusion. - Magnetic resonance spectroscopy showed the ratio of ATP and phosphocreatine. Results and discussion. In the treatment, we suggested gradually picking up medicines, starting with nitrates. But they do not often have any positive effect. In literature, their effectiveness is described only in 50% of patients. So, if there is no effect, beta-blockers are used, which in most cases are drugs of choice. Calcium antagonists and prolonged nitrates did not justify confidence in monotherapy, but in combination with beta-blockers, their effectiveness increased several times. If there is no effect again, ACE inhibitors are used. The literature describes the data of long-term (within 6-12 months) treatment of patients with coronary syndrome X with perindopril in a dose of 4-8 mg per day, which leads to a decrease in the frequency of angina attacks in 55% of patients, an increase in threshold load power – by 22.2%, its time – at 32.4% with the disappearance of signs of ischemia during a load test in 30% of patients. Conclusions. Considering the positive effect of perindopril in clinical manifestations, exercise tolerance, endothelial function and autonomic heart function in patients with coronary syndrome X, it is advisable to recommend inclusion of this drug in the treatment of such patients as a means of pathogenetic therapy. According to a large number of studies, ACE inhibitors improve endothelial dysfunction and can positively affect the manifestation of coronary syndrome X. In a double-controlled placebo trial, it was demonstrated that using perindopril for eight weeks not only significantly improved the performance of samples with physical activity, but also the reserve of coronary blood flow and the level of endothelial nitric oxide in patients with coronary syndrome X. Positive effects of the use of ACE inhibitors are associated with the restoration of levels of endothelial nitric oxide and a decrease in the ratio of L-arginine and dimethylarginine. At the same time, the use of calcium channel blockers as monotherapy is controversial.

Keywords: coronary syndrome X, cardiac syndrome X, microvascular angina

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 191K

References
  1. Gudym OV, Palash TM. Koronarnyy syndrom X u zhinok z PBLNPG: patogenetychni mekhanizmy, diagnostyka ta efektyvnist terapiyi na etapi statsionarnogo likuvannya v umovakh bagatoprofilnoyi likarni. Aktualni problemy klinichnoyi ta profilaktychnoyi medytsyny. 2013; 1 (2): 68-75. [Ukrainian]
  2. Bugiardini R, Manfrini O, Pizzi C, Fontana F, Morgagni G. Endothelial function predicts future development of coronary artery disease: a study of women with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Сirculation. 2004; 109 (21): 2518-23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15136498. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000128208.22378.E3
  3. Mikovaskulyarna stenokardiya, yak vyd stabilnoyi stenokardiyi naprugy. Available from: http://zdorovia.net.ua/archives/47216 [Ukrainian]
  4. Sharaf BL, Pepine CJ, Kerensky RA, Reis SE, Reichek N, Rogers WJ, Sopko G, Kelsey SF, et al. Detailed angiographic analysis of women with suspected ischemic chest pain (pilot phase data from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE] Study Angiographic Core Laboratory. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 937-41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11305981. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01424-2
  5. Oto A, Gurses KM. Stabile primary microvascular angina. Eur J ESC Counci l for Cardiolodgy Practice. 2014; 12 (30).
  6. Profylaktyka y reabylytatsyya patsyentov s ostrym koronarnym syndromom. Praktychna angiologiya. 2009; 6 (2): 17. [Russian]
  7. Amosova KM, Zakharova VI, Andryeyev YeV, Rudenko YuV. Efektyvnist dovgotryvalogo zastosuvannya peryndoprylu u khvorykh z koronarnym syndromom X. Ukr kardiol zhurnal. 2007; 5: 152. [Ukrainian]
  8. Chen JW, Hsu NW, Wu TC, Lin SJ, Chang MS. Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition reduces plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine and improves endothelial nitric oxide bioavailability and coronary microvascular function in patients with syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Nov 1; 90 (9): 974-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398965. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02664-4
  9. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, Bugiardini R, Crea F, Cuisset T, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct; 34 (38): 2949-3003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23996286. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht296.
  10. Agraval S, Mehta PK, Bairey Merz ND. Cardiac Syndrome X: update 2014. Cardiol Clin. 2014; 32 (3): 463-78. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25091971. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4122947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2014.04.006
  11. Marzilli M, Merz CNB, Boden WE, et al. Ratsionalna farmakoterapiya v kardiologiyi. 2012; 8 (5): 721-6.
  12. Rogacka D, Guzik P, Wykretowicz A, Rzezniczak J, Dziarmaga M, Wysocki H. Effects of trimetazidine on clinical symptoms and tolerance of exercise of patients with syndrome X: a preliminary study. Coron Artery Dis. 2000; 11 (2): 171-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019501-200003000-00012
  13. Fox K, Garcia MA, Adrissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F, Daly C, De Backer G, et al. Guidelines on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris: Executive Summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27 (11): 1341-81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16735367. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl001
  14. Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, Graham I, Taskinen MR, Wiklund O, Agewall S, Alegria E, Chapman MJ, et.al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 2011; 32: 1769-818. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712404. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr158
  15. Parsian A, Pilote L. Cardiac syndrome X: mystery continues. Can J Cardiol. 2012; 28 (Suppl 2): S3-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2011.09.017