ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 32 of 55
Up
УЖМБС 2022, 7(5): 204–209
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs07.05.204
Physical Therapy and Ergotherapy

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Physical Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Dzis O. Ye. 1, Korytko Z. I. 1, Tomashevska O. Ya. 2, Dzis Ye. I. 2
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy in the rehabilitation of persons who have suffered from COVID-19 pneumonia, in terms of its effect on health-related quality of life and functional status of patients. Materials and methods. Using the questionnaire, an anonymous survey of 68 people who suffered from COVID-19 pneumonia was conducted: 27 men and 41 women aged 18-90 years (median – 58 years). To determine the effectiveness of physical therapy, we used the assessment of quality of life on a 100-point percentage scale and the level of functioning on the scale of Post-COVID-19 Functional Status. Results and discussion. Among the examined persons, physical therapy was carried out only in 37 cases (54%). Two groups of patients were formed: group 1 (37 people) – with the use of physical therapy, group 2 (31 people) – without the use. Physical therapy methods were positioning, breathing exercises, aerobic exercises for different muscle groups, walking, and swimming. In group 1, 23 people out of 35 (66%) followed prone positioning, while in group 2 – only 4 people out of 21 (19%) (p=0.001). The vast majority of patients in group 1, 31 out of 34 (91%), were engaged in physical therapy on one's own (participation of rehabilitators was only in 2 cases, 6%), and they mainly used Internet resources to study the physical therapy techniques (18 out of 29, 62%). According to the quality of life before the onset of the disease, groups 1 and 2 did not differ from each other (respectively, 80.7 ± 13.3% vs 82.6 ± 11.5%, p >0.05). After the acute period of the disease, the quality of life decreased more prominent in people of group 1 and was 58.1 ± 17.0% against 66.8 ± 15.4% in group 2 (p=0.026). After recovery, the quality of life of patients of group 1 significantly increased in relation to the state after the acute period compared to group 2, namely by 15.9 ± 11.5% vs 9.7 ± 8.9%, respectively (p=0.019). In patients who started physical therapy in the acute phase of the disease (9 out of 25, 36%), compared to those who started physical therapy only in the post-acute phase (16 people, 64%), there was a significantly less pronounced decrease in the quality of life after the acute phase compared with the condition before the onset of the disease (respectively, by 11.1 ± 7.8% vs 30.0 ± 14.1%, p=0.002). In general, 28 patients out of 30 people (93%) of group 1 indicated the effectiveness of the rehabilitation, most often a good effect (21 people, 70%). Level of functioning on the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale significantly improved compared to the state before the start of rehabilitation (respectively, 0.83 ± 1.07 vs 1.9 ± 3.0, p=0.008). However, the quality of life after recovery in group 1 did not reach the level that was before the disease (respectively, 74.1 ± 13.0% vs 80.7 ± 13.3%, p=0.001), which was also observed in group 2. Conclusion. The results of the study indicate efficiency of the use of physical therapy for the rehabilitation of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Physical therapy should be started already in the acute phase of the disease, as it contributes to a less pronounced deterioration of the quality of life after this phase

Keywords: COVID-19 pneumonia, physical therapy, rehabilitation, quality of life, functional status

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 258K

References
  1. MOZ Ukrainy Nakaz № 771 vid 20.04.2021. Pro zatverdzhennya Protokolu nadannya reabilitatsiynoi dopomohy patsiyentam z koronavirusnoyu khvoroboyu (COVID 19) ta rekonvalestsentam [On the approval of the Protocol for the provision of rehabilitation assistance to patients with coronavirus disease (COVID 19) and convalescents]. [Ukrainian]
  2. Tymruk-Skoropad KA, Korytko ZI, Tomashevska OYa, Dzis YeI, Dzis OYe. Pidkhody do lehenevoi reabilitatsiyi patsiyentiv iz riznymy formamy COVID 19 [Approaches to Physical Therapy for Patients with COVID-19 in Acute and Post-Acute Phases of the Disease]. Ukr Zh Med Biol Sportu. 2021;3(31):317-323. [Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs06.03.317
  3. Dzis OYe, Korytko ZI, Tymruk-Skoropad KA. Osoblyvosti lehenevoi reabilitatsiyi patsiyentiv z lehkoyu formoyu COVID-19 pid chas ambulatornoho likuvannya [Peculiarities of pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with a mild form of COVID-19 during outpatient treatment]. Materialy Mizhnar nauk-prakt konf “Fizychna kultura i sport v osvitnomu prostori: innovatsiyi ta perspektyvy rozvytku”. Vlotslavek, 2021. 2021. s. 49-53. [Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-044-5-11
  4. de Oliveira Almeida K, Nogueira Alves I, de Queiroz R, de Castro M, Gomes V, Santos Fontoura F, et al. A systematic review on physical function, activities of daily living and health-related quality of life in COVID-19 survivors. Chronic Illn. 2022 Apr 11:17423953221089309. PMID: 35404175. PMCID: PMC9006095. https://doi.org/10.1177/17423953221089309
  5. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, Madhavan M, McGroder C, Stevens J et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):601-615. PMID: 33753937. PMCID: PMC8893149. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z
  6. Sheehy L. Considerations for Postacute Rehabilitation for Survivors of COVID-19. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e19462. PMID: 32369030. PMCID: PMC7212817. https://doi.org/10.2196/19462
  7. Imboden M, Harber M, Whaley M, Finch W, Bishop D, Kaminsky L. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Mortality in Healthy Men and Women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(19):2283-2292. PMID: 30384883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2166
  8. Debeuf R, Swinnen E, Plattiau T, De Smedt A, De Waele E, Roggeman S, et al. Effect of physical therapy on impairments in COVID-19 patients from intensive care to home rehabilitation: A rapid review. J Rehabil Med. 2022 Jan 3;54:jrm00242. PMID: 34633050. PMCID: PMC8862642. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.8