The purpose of the study was to carry out a comparative analysis of self-etching self-adhesive double-fixation cements for indirect restorations in terms of physical and mechanical properties. Materials and methods. For comparison, in terms of physical and mechanical parameters, a self-etching self-adhesive composite cement for indirect restorations "Maxcem Elite", Kerr, California, USA was taken. "Maxcem Elite" refers to self-etching self-adhesive composite cements of double fixation, which has a number of positive qualities, such as high physical and mechanical properties, good aesthetic properties, radiopacity. We analyzed the following physical and mechanical parameters: the appearance of the paste, depth of hardening, mm, diametric strength, MPa, conical yield point according to Heppler, MPa, hardness according to Heppler, MPa, water absorption in 7 days, μg/mm3, water solubility in 7 days μg/mm3, adhesive strength, MPa, peel strength, MPa. Results and discussion. According to the average test depth of hardening (mm) material "Maxcem Elite" is inferior to others: material Bifix QV by 14.9% and Relyx U 100 by 13.3%. This does not significantly affect the quality of the connection of the adhesive structure with the hard tissues of the tooth, especially due to the method we have developed for the preparation of abutment teeth in the manufacturing of adhesive pads. On the other hand, according to the average value of the index of diametrical strength (MPa), the studied material "Maxcem Elite" is by 17.2% better than Bifix QV, and by 17.3% better than Relyx U 100. Comparing these and other physical and mechanical properties of materials on average, one must bear in mind the random nature of these values. From the results of the study, it can be seen that the difference between the indicators of the Maxcem Elite material and analogues is confirmed at a very high level of significance. The study of the level of water absorption indicates the probable absence of variability of the indicator of the studied material in comparison with comparable analogs. The value of the water solubility index of all the composites under study practically does not differ from the value of "Maxcem Elite" (within (2.5±0.1) %), and corresponds to the requirements of ISO 4046. Conclusion. The research results show that the investigated composite material "Maxcem Elite" in the main parameters corresponds to analogs, in most of the indicators it combines their best characteristics. In it, the adhesive strength of the connection with the hard tissues of the tooth is noticeably enhanced and better peel strength makes it possible to profitably use this material "Maxcem Elite" for fixing the adhesive structures

Keywords: bridge, self-etching self-adhesive cements, double-fixation cements, X-ray contrast, adhesive strength, peel strength

Full text: PDF (Ua) 251K

1. Dvornikova TS. Volokonnoe armirovanie v povsednevnoj klinicheskoj praktike. Chast II. Sozdanie adgezivnyh mostovidnyh protezov [Fiber reinforcement in everyday clinical practice. Part II. Creation of adhesive bridges]. Institut stomatologii. 2009;4:38–41. [Russian]
2. Kaveckij VP. Kliniko-laboratornoe obosnovanie primeneniya adgezivnyh volokonnyh konstrukcij v esteticheskoj stomatologii [Clinical and laboratory substantiation of the use of adhesive fiber structures in aesthetic dentistry]. Abstr. PhDr. (Med.). Minsk; 2013. 22 s. [Russian]
3. Kaveckij VP, Polyakov KM. Adgezivnye mostovidnye protezy: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Adhesive bridges: teaching aid]. Minsk: BelMAPO; 2009. 14 p. [Russian]
4. Grigoreva EA, Bolonkin VP, Belousova LG, Hajkin MB, Shevchuk EN. Obosnovanie primeneniya novogo adgezivnogo mostovidnogo proteza pri vosstanovlenii malyh defektov zubnyh ryadov [Rationale for the use of a new adhesive bridge prosthesis in the restoration of small defects in the dentition]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN. 2015;17(1–3):770–3. [Russian]
5. Parhamovich SN, Tyukova EA. Sovremennye podhody primeneniya volokonnyh armiruyushih sistem dlya adgezivnogo shinirovaniya i mikroprotezirovaniya [Modern approaches to the use of fiber reinforcement systems for adhesive splinting and microprosthetics]. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2016;3:43–8. [Russian]
6. Kazeko LA, Boriseeva, OA, Baranovskaya MS. Volokonnye sistemy v terapevticheskoj stomatologii: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Fiber systems in therapeutic dentistry: a teaching aid]. Minsk: BGMU; 2010. 24 p. [Russian]
7. Nikolaev YuM. Novoe pokolenie fiksiruyushih cementov v klinike ortopedicheskoj stomatologii [A new generation of luting cements in the clinic of orthopedic dentistry]. Problemy stomatologii. 2012;3:50-3. [Russian]
8. Mironov EA. Obosnovanie vybora fiksiruyushego agenta dlya nepryamyh restavracij [Rationale for the choice of luting agent for indirect restorations]. Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences. 2014;4(5):756-9. [Russian]
9. Daiichiro Y, Akikazu Sh, Harunori G, Pekka KV, Akiyoshi Sh. Effects of Mechanical Properties of Adhesive Resin Cements on Stress Distribution in Fiber-Reinforced Composite Adhesive Fixed Partial Dentures. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(2):189-196. PMID: 22447051. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-104
10. Maxcem Elite™ Samoprotravlivayushij, samoadgezivnyj kompozitnyj cement dlya postoyannoj fiksacii [Maxcem Elite™ Self-etching, self-adhesive composite cement for permanent luting]. [Russian]. Available from: https://www.kerrdental.com/ru-ru/
11. Yanishen IV, German SA, Yarina IM, Sidorova OV, Sorohan MM. Porivnyalna ocinka fiziko-mehanichnih vlastivostej stomatologichnih cementiv dlya postijnoyi fiksaciyi ortopedichnih konstrukcij [Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Dental Cements for Permanent Fixation of Orthopedic Dentures]. Ukrayinskij zhurnal medicini, biologiyi ta sportu. 2018;6(15):240-4. [Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs03.06.240
12. Sorohan MM, Byelikov OB, Byelikova NI, Byelikova LO. Analiz fiziko-mehanichnih vlastivostej kompozitnogo materialu Maxcem Elite™ u porivnyalnomu aspekti z fiksuyuchimi materialami dlya nepryamih restavracij [Analysis of physical and mechanical properties of composite material by Maxcem Elite™ in comparative aspect with fixing materials for indirect restorations]. Eurasian scientific congress. Abstracts of the 7th International scientific and practical conference. Barca Academy Publishing. Barcelona, Spain; 2020. 2020. p. 94-98. [Ukrainian]. Available from: https://sci-conf.com.ua.
13. Kuznecov RV. Planuvannya opornih elementiv ta udoskonalennya metodiv fiksaciyi adgezivnih mostopodibnih proteziv [Planning of support elements and improvement of methods of fixing adhesive bridges]. Abstr. PhDr. (Med.). Poltava; 2006. 168 p. [Ukrainian]
14. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):295-314. PMID: 21133983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x
15. Makkenzi BL. Fiksatsiya nepryamoy restavratsii na tsement Maxcem Elite Chroma [Cementation of an indirect restoration with Maxcem Elite Chroma cement]. Dental Tribune. 2017 May 09. Available from: https://ru.dental-tribune.com/clinical/ [Russian]
16. Muradov MA. Samoadgezivni kompozytni tsementy v praktytsi ortopedychnoyi stomatologiyi [Self-adhesive composite cement in the practice of orthopedic dentistry]. Klinichna stomatologiya. 2013;4:30–7. [Ukrainian]