ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 30 of 50
Up
УЖМБС 2021, 6(3): 226–231
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs06.03.226
Microbiology

Sensitivity to Antibiotics of Staphylococcus Aureus Strains, Able to Biofilm Formation

Vashchenko A. O., Voronkova Yu. S., Vinnikov A. I., Shevchenko T. N., Voronkova O. S.
Abstract

The problem of respiratory diseases associated with staphylococcal carriers is considered to be one of the most acute in modern society due to its high prevalence and problems with treatment due to the high resistance of these bacteria to antibiotics. The purpose of the study was to determine the sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus strains, able to form biofilm, isolated from the upper respiratory tract of human. Materials and methods. Bacteriological methods of isolation and identification of staphylococci, the method of rapid determination of the ability to form biofilm on a tablet and the disk-diffusion method of determining the susceptibility to antibiotics were used to perform the research. As a result of the conducted researches it was established that in the structure of pathogens of exacerbations of seasonal rhinitis S. aureus prevailed. It was isolated from 34 samples of biological material from the nose, which accounted for 69.4% of all examined cases of rhinitis. Staphylococcus spp. (6.1%) and Streptococcus spp. (24.5%) among the isolated strains of S. aureus, 27 (79.4%) had the ability to form a biofilm. A feature associated with antibiotic resistance is the ability of strains of microorganisms to form a biofilm, in which they acquire enhanced ability to survive under adverse environmental factors, including the use of drugs. Results and discussion. In our research we showed that more than 80% of film-forming strains were found to be susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin / clavulanic acid and azithromycin. 4 (14.8%) are methicillin-resistant. Resistance to methicillin was detected simultaneously with resistance to ciprofloxacin (3 cases) and to azithromycin (2 cases), 1 strain was resistant to gentamicin and 2 – to tetracycline. 1 of the methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus was multidrug-resistant (showed resistance to all studied antibiotics). Among non-biofilm strains, more than 80% of the strains were also sensitive to ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin / clavulanic acid and azithromycin. Sensitivity to tetracycline was low in both groups (42-63% sensitive). Conclusion. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance among clinical strains of opportunistic bacteria, unfortunately, shows an increasing trend. This requires constant monitoring of susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs in order to develop schemes of rational antibiotic therapy, taking into account the individualized approach to patients. In this sense, it is promising when studying the biological properties of clinical isolates to determine not only the resistance to antibiotics, but also their ability to form a biofilm

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, carriage, rhinitis, biofilm, antibioticresistance

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 296K

References
  1. de Benito S, Alou L, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Gómez-Lus ML, Collado L, et al. Prevalence of Staphylococcus spp. nasal colonization among doctors of podiatric medicine and associated risk factors in Spain. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018; 7: 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0318-0
  2. Xie X, Dai X, Ni L, Chen B, Luo Z, Yao Y, et al. Molecular epidemiology and virulence characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in medical laboratory staff: comparison between microbiological and non-microbiological laboratories. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1): 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3024-x
  3. Lakhundi S, Zhang K. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018; 31(4): e00020-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00020-18
  4. Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, Eichenberger EM, Shah PP, Carugati M, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019; 17(4): 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4
  5. Abdel Halim RM, Kassem NN, Mahmoud BS. Detection of Biofilm Producing Staphylococci among Different Clinical Isolates and Its Relation to Methicillin Susceptibility. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6(8): 1335-1341. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.246
  6. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15(2): 167–193. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002
  7. Olson ME, Ceri H, Morck DW, Buret AG, Read RR. Biofilm bacteria: formation and compararive susceptibility of antibiotics. Can J Vet Res. 2002; 66(2): 86–92.
  8. Dakheel KH, Abdul Rahim R, Neela VK, Al-Obaidi JR, Hun TG, Yusoff K. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms and Their Influence on Bacterial Adhesion and Cohesion. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 4708425. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4708425
  9. Hiltunen AK, Savijoki K, Nyman TA, Miettinen I, Ihalainen P, Peltonen J, et al. Structural and Functional Dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms and Biofilm Matrix Proteins on Different Clinical Materials. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(12): 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120584
  10. Boase S, Foreman A, Cleland E, Tan L, Melton-Kreft R, Pant H, et al. The microbiome of chronic rhinosinusitis: culture, molecular diagnostics and biofilm detection. BMC Infect Dis. 2013; 13: 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-210
  11. Wolcott R, Costerton JW, Raoult D, Cutler SJ. The polymicrobial nature of biofilm infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013; 19(2): 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.04001.x
  12. Holt JG, Кrieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST. (Eds.). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Baltimore: Williams&Wilkins; 1994.
  13. Labinskaia АS, Volina YeH. (Eds.). Manual of Medical Microbiology. General and sanitary microbiology. М: Binom; 2008.
  14. Manner S, Goeres DM, Skogman M, Vuorela P, Fallarero A. Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation by antibiotics in 96-Microtiter Well Plates and Drip Flow Reactors: critical factors influencing outcomes. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 43854. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43854
  15. CLSI Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. 11th ed. CLSI standart M07. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standarts Institute; 2018. 13 p. Available from: https://clsi.org/media/1928/m07ed11_sample.pdf
  16. Chen BJ, Xie XY, Ni LJ, Dai XL, Lu Y, Wu XQ, et al. Factors associated with Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and molecular characteristics among the general population at a Medical College Campus in Guangzhou, South China. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017; 16(1): 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-017-0206-0
  17. Ghellai L, Hassaine H, Klouche N, Abdelmounaim K. Detection of biofilm formation of a collection of fifty strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Algeria at the University Hospital of Tlemcen. J Bacteriol Res. 2014; 6(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5897/JBR2013.0122
  18. Singh R, Ray Р, Das А, Sharma М. Penetration of antibiotics through Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob Chemother. 2010; 65(9): 1955-1958. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq257