ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 16 of 58
Up
УЖМБС 2020, 5(6): 117–123
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs05.06.117
Clinical Medicine

Possibilities of Clinical Neurovisualization Verification of Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage Acute Period Course Prognosis on the Ground of Conservative Treatment

Kozyolkin O. A., Kuznietsov A. A.
Abstract

The aim of the study – to improve the diagnostic measures in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage through elaboration of the prognostic criteria for the early neurological deterioration on the ground of comparative analysis of clinical scales that evaluate the severity of patient’s condition. Materials and methods. Prospective, cohort investigation of 339 patients (mean age 64,8±0,6 years) in acute period of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage was done. The diagnosis was made on the ground of clinical, neurovisualization examination. Initial patient’s condition severity was estimated by using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, original Intracerebral Hemorrhage Scale (oICH), modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage Scales (mICH-A, mICH-B), Intracerebral Hemorrhage Grading Scale (ICH-GS), Intracerebral Hemorrhage Functional Outcome Scale (ICH-FOS). The early neurological deterioration was used as a cumulative end-point. It was detected as onset of one or some events from the following during 24 hours from the admission on the ground of conservative therapy: 1) decrease of FOUR score ≥2; 2) increase of NIHSS score ≥4; 3) lethal outcome. Logistic regression and ROC-analysis were used for prognostic criteria elaboration. Results. Clinical neurological deterioration during 24 hours from admission was revealed in 99 (29,2%) patients. On the ground of univariate logistic regression analysis it was detected that the risk of early neurological deterioration in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage on the ground of conservative therapy is evaluated as the following summary score: oICH (OR (95% CІ) = 2,71 (2,07–3,55), р˂0,0001), mICH-A (OR (95% CІ) = 1,70 (1,50–1,93), р˂0,0001), mICH-B (OR (95% CІ) = 1,81 (1,57–2,09), р˂0,0001), ICH-GS (OR (95% CІ) = 1,91 (1,59–2,29), р˂0,0001) and ICH-FOS (OR (95% CI) = 1,40 (1,28–1,54), р˂0,0001). It was detected that mICH-A and mICH-B scales differ with higher AUC values compared with oICH, ICH-GS and ICH-FOS concerning early neurological deterioration prediction in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions. Early neurological deterioration predictors in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage during 24 hours from the admission are the mICH-A score >4 (sensitivity = 71,7%, specificity = 78,8%) and mICH-B score >2 (sensitivity = 82,8%, specificity = 63,8%)

Keywords: intracerebral hemorrhage, early neurological deterioration, functional prognosis

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 273K

References
  1. Veltkamp R, Purrucker J. Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017; 17(10): 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0783-5
  2. Hostettler IC, Seiffge DJ, Werring DJ. Intracerebral hemorrhage: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2019; 19(7): 679-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2019.1623671
  3. de Oliveira Manoel AL, Goffi A, Zampieri FG, Turkel-Parrella D, Duggal A, Marotta TR, et al. The critical care management of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage: a contemporary review. Crit Care. 2016; 20: 272. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1432-0
  4. Ovesen C, Christensen AF, Havsteen I, Krarup Hansen C, Rosenbaum S, Kurt E, et al. Prediction and prognostication of neurological deterioration in patients with acute ICH: a hospital-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(7): e008563. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008563
  5. Specogna AV, Turin TC, Patten SB, Hill MD. Factors associated with early deterioration after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5): e96743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096743
  6. Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001; 32(4): 891-7. PMID: 11283388. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.4.891
  7. Ji R, Shen H, Pan Y, Wang P, Liu G, Wang Y, et al. A novel risk score to predict 1-year functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage and comparison with existing scores. Crit Care. 2013; 17(6): R275. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13130
  8. Satopää J, Mustanoja S, Meretoja A, Putaala J, Kaste M, Niemelä M, et al. Comparison of all 19 published prognostic scores for intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2017; 379: 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2017.05.034
  9. Nakaz No 275 vid 17.04.2014 Ministerstva okhorony zdorovya Ukrayiny. Unifikovanyy klinichnyy protokol ekstrenoyi, pervynnoyi, vtorynnoyi (spetsializovanoyi), tretynnoyi (vysokospetsializovanoyi) medychnoyi dopomohy ta medychnoyi reabilitatsiyi «Hemorahichnyy insul't (vnutrishn'omozkova hematoma, anevryzmal'nyy subarakhnoyidal'nyy krovovylyv)» [Unified clinical protocol of emergency, primary, secondary (specialized), tertiary (highly specialized) medical care and medical rehabilitation "Hemorrhagic stroke (intracerebral hematoma, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage)"]. 2014. Available https://dec.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/images/dodatki/2014_275_GI/2014_275_YKPMD_GI.pdf
  10. Lord AS, Gilmore E, Choi HA, Mayer SA; VISTA-ICH Collaboration. Time course and predictors of neurological deterioration after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2015; 46(3): 647-652. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007704
  11. Stretz C, Gao C, Greer DM, Loomis C, Gilmore EJ, Kundishora AJ, et al. Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Intraventricular Extension-Getting the Prognosis Right Early. Front Neurol. 2017; 8: 418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00418
  12. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993; 39(4): 561-577.