ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 36 of 68
Up
JMBS 2021, 6(5): 255–262
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs06.05.255
Clinical Medicine

Pathomorphological Features of the Mucoperiostasis of the Processus Uncinatus in Discrete Diseases of the Maxillary Sinus

Shkorbotun Ya. V. 1,2, Kuryk O. G. 3
Abstract

The state of the mucoperiostasis of the maxillary sinus is one of the important factors that affect the effectiveness of dental implantation, especially in case of need for augmentation of the maxillary bone. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, chronic rhinosinusitis with fungal bodies, and sinus cysts are among the most common pathological processes in the maxillary sinus that are encountered when performing subantral augmentation. In addition, a separate category of patients is made up of those with a history of sinus surgery in their anamnesis. The condition of sinus mucoperiosteum can be estimated based on results of processus uncinatus research, because it has a similar histological structure, directly contacts with all maxillary sinus excretion and, as usual, gets removed while endoscopic sinusotomy. The purpose of the work was to study the histological features of mucoperiostasis and adjacent bone in the ostiomeatal complex in discrete diseases of paranasal sinuses: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, maxillary sinus cysts, fungal balls and postoperative scar changes in the ostium. Materials and methods. Histological features of processus uncinatus fragments removed during endoscopic interventions in 45 patients were investigated: with sinus cysts – 12 patients (group 1), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps – 13 patients (group 2), sinus fungal body – 13 patients (group 3) and postoperative scarring changes in the ostiomeatal complex – 7 patients. The condition of the epithelial layer of the mucoperiosteum, the structure of its own plate, the periosteal layer and the bone to be treated were evaluated. Results and discussion. In 91.67 ± 0.08% of patients with maxillary sinus cysts, there were no changes in the mucoperiostasis and the bone of processus uncinatus. Most patients in groups 2 and 3 showed mucoperiostal edema with a predominant reaction of the mucosal layer and lamina propria. Fibrous changes of the processus uncinatus were most often detected after the intervention was performed at 71.43 ± 0.13% and in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps – 53.85 ± 0.14%. This confirms the significance of the mucoperiostasis injury factor with the underlying bone for the development of gross adhesive changes between the periosteum and bone tissue. Osteitis of the processus uncinatus was detected in 38.46 ± 0.13% of patients in group 2, 15.38 ± 0.1% in group 3, and 28.57 ± 0.17% in group 4. Conclusion. Signs of periostitis and processus uncinatus osteitis were most often detected in patients with neutrophilic mucoperiosteum infiltration in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and in fungal balls sinus. History of surgery with periosteal and bone trauma promotes scarring and results in a tight connection between bone and periosteum, which can be regarded as a risk factor in relation to the rupture of the later in its peeling off during sinus lifting procedure. Therefore, when performing surgery on the maxillary sinus, in order to maintain conditions for possible dental implantation, excessive trauma of the periosteal layer of mucoperiosteum should be avoided

Keywords: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, maxillary sinus cysts, sinus fungal balls, postoperative scar, processus uncinatus

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 445K

References
  1. Magomedov MM, Zeinalova DF, Magomedova NM, Starostina AE. Funkcional'noe sostojanie slizistoj obolochki polosti nosa i okoklonosovyh pazuh posle radikal'yh i maloinvazivnyh hirurgicheskih vmeshatel'stv [The functional conditions of nasal cavity mucosa and paranasal sinuses following radical and minimally invasive surgical interventions]. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2016;81(2):88-92. [Russian]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27351042. https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201681288-92
  2. Insua A, Monje A, Chan HL, Wang HL. Association of Inflammatory Status and Maxillary Sinus Schneiderian Membrane Thickness. Clin Oral Invest. 2018;22:245–254. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28349218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2105-3
  3. Lum AG, Ogata Yu, Pagni SE, Hur Yo. The Association Between Sinus Membrane Thickness and Membrane Perforation in Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Study. J Periodontol. 2017 Jun;88(6):543-549. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28398119. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.160694
  4. Montone KT. Pathology of Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Review. Head Neck Pathol. 2016;10:40–46. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26830404. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4746136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-016-0690-0
  5. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bone Quality and Quantity and Dental Implant Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2017 May/June;30(3):219–237. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28319206. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5142
  6. Shkorbotun YaV. Porivnjannja chastoty vyjavlennja okremyh rentgenologichnyh oznak pry hronichnomu verhn'oshhelepnomu synusyti grybkovogo ta negrybkovogo g'enezu [Comparison of the Frequency of Detection of Some Radiological Signs in Chronic Maxillary Sinusіtis of Fungal and Non-Fungal Origin]. Ukr J Med Biol Sport. 2020;5(6):202–207. [Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs05.06.202
  7. Sawatsubashi M. Endoscopic Surgical Procedures for Fungal Maxillary Sinusitis: How to Do It, a Review. Int J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;07:287-297. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijohns.2018.75029
  8. Grjibovski AM, Ivanov SV. Gorbatova MA. Opisatel'naja statistika s ispol'zovaniem paketov statisticheskih programm Statistica i SPSS. [Descriptive statistics using statistica and spss software]. Sci Health Care. 2016;1:7-23. [Russian]
  9. Wake M, Takeno S, Hawke M. The uncinate process: a histological and morphological study. Laryngoscope. 1994 Mar;104(3 Pt 1):364-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8127195. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199403000-00020
  10. Wang CY, Wang BB, Yao XL, Zhang F, Zhao YY, Li ZY, et al. Mucous gland cyst in uncinate process. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Mar 5;132(5):604-605. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30807359. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6416092. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000104
  11. Bhattacharyya N. Do maxillary sinus retention cysts reflect obstructive sinus phenomena? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Nov;126(11):1369-71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11074835. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.126.11.1369
  12. Kryukov AI, Zairatyants OV, Tsarapkin GY, Arzamazov SG, Gorovaya EV, Fedotkina KM, et al. Ostiomeatal'nyj kompleks pri retencionnyh kistah verhnecheljustnogo sinusa [The ostiomeatal complex in retention cysts of the maxillary sinus]. Rus rhinol. 2015;4:3-7. [Russian]. https://doi.org/10.17116/rosrino20152343-7
  13. Koennecke M, Klimek L, Mullol J, Gevaert P, Wollenberg B. Subtyping of polyposis nasi: phenotypes, endotypes and comorbidities. Allergo J Int. 2018;27(2):56-65. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29564208. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5842507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-017-0048-5
  14. Changzhi S, Hong O, Renzhong L. Distinct characteristics of nasal polyps with and without eosinophilia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83(1):66-72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27166273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.012
  15. Snidvongs K, McLachlan R, Sacks R, Earls P, Harvey RJ. Correlation of the Kennedy Osteitis Score to clinico-histologic features of chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3:369-375. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23136070. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21113