ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 3 of 42
Up
JMBS 2020, 5(2): 29–35
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs05.02.029
Medicine. Reviews

Neonatal Sepsis: Modern Directions of Diagnostics

Kosenko K. O.
Abstract

Neonatal sepsis is one of the most relevant and debatable problems of modern neonatology. Despite improved therapeutic strategies, sepsis remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period, especially among premature newborns, low-birth-weight newborns and extremely low birth weight newborns. Timely diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is a difficult task due to the lack of a specific clinical picture of the disease and insufficient diagnostic value of existing laboratory tests. Nowadays none of the laboratory markers is characterized by a high level of diagnostic significance in order to use it as the only criterion for the accurate diagnosis of sepsis in newborns. Therefore, this disease should be diagnosed comprehensively, only taking into account clinical data and the results of laboratory and instrumental methods. Expanding the neonatal sepsis complex integrated diagnostic panel will allow predicting the development of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiple organ dysfunctions in the early stages of the disease, which, in the end, will help to choose the optimal tactics for effective antibiotic therapy. It is relevant to search for new modern tests that may be of clinical importance for the diagnosis, prognosis and effectiveness of therapy. The article provides a review of international studies on the effectiveness of the new marker of sepsis, namely triggering receptor, expressed on myeloid cells type-1 for early diagnosis and monitoring of neonatal sepsis, reflects information about the statistical value of the test in sensitivity, specificity, prognostic value of positive and negative results. There are modern data on the determination of the soluble form of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells type-1has high sensitivity and specificity for the differential diagnosis between neonatal sepsis and non-infectious critical conditions in newborns. An analysis of the literature data suggests that the definition of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells type-1 has early diagnostic and prognostic value, which allows it to be recommended for clinical usage in order to further improve the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and, as a result, a decrease in the mortality rate and the development of long-term adverse prognoses from this disease. Conclusion. It is advisable to conduct further large-scale studies aimed at determining the reference values of the content of the soluble form of the receptor in the blood serum of newborns taking into account the gestational age and birth weight.

Keywords: neonatal sepsis, diagnostics, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells type-1, preterm infants

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 210K

References
  1. Ng S, Strunk T, Jiang P, Muk T, Sangild PT, Currie A. Precision Medicine for Neonatal Sepsis. Front Mol Biosci. 2018; 5: 70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2018.00070
  2. Iroh Tam PY, Bendel CM. Diagnostics for neonatal sepsis: current approaches and future directions. Pediatr Res. 2017; 82(4): 574-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.134
  3. Memar MY, Alizadeh N, Varshochi M, Kafil HS. Immunologic biomarkers for diagnostic of early-onset neonatal sepsis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32(1): 143-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1366984
  4. Wynn JL. Defining neonatal sepsis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016; 28(2): 135-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000315
  5. Gilfillan M, Bhandari V. Biomarkers for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis: Clinical practice guidelines. Early Hum Dev. 2017; 105: 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.12.002
  6. Seale AC, Obiero CW, Berkley JA. Rational development of guidelines for management of neonatal sepsis in developing countries. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015; 28(3): 225-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000163
  7. Camacho-Gonzalez A, Spearman PW, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infectious diseases: evaluation of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013; 60(2): 367-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2012.12.003
  8. Wynn JL, Wong HR, Shanley TP, Bizzarro MJ, Saiman L, Polin RA. Time for a neonatal-specific consensus definition for sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014; 15(6): 523-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000000157
  9. Shah BA, Padbury JF. Neonatal sepsis: an old problem with new insights. Virulence. 2014; 5(1): 170-8. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.26906
  10. Ruan L, Chen GY, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Xu GY, Li SF, et al. The combination of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Crit Care. 2018; 22(1): 316. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2236-1
  11. Nehring SM, Patel BC. C Reactive Protein (CRP). StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL); 2019. PMID: 28722873
  12. Hisamuddin E, Hisam A, Wahid S, Raza G. Validity of C-reactive protein (CRP) for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Pak J Med Sci. 2015; 31(3): 527-31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.313.6668
  13. Brown JVE, Meader N, Cleminson J, McGuire W. C-reactive protein for diagnosing late-onset infection in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 1: CD012126. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012126.pub2
  14. Dritsakou K, Liosis G, Gioni M, Glynou E, Avdeliodi K, Papagaroufalis K. CRP levels in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) septic infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28(2): 237-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.908842
  15. Hofer N, Jank K, Strenger V, Pansy J, Resch B. Inflammatory indices in meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016; 51(6): 601-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.23349
  16. Muniraman H, Gardner D, Skinner J, Paweletz A, Vayalakkad A, Chee YH, et al. Biomarkers of hepatic injury and function in neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and with therapeutic hypothermia. Eur J Pediatr. 2017; 176(10): 1295-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2956-2
  17. Shang Y, Mu L, Guo X, Li Y, Wang L, Yang W, et al. Clinical significance of interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Exp Ther Med. 2014; 8(4): 1259-62. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1869
  18. Samsudin I, Vasikaran SD. Clinical Utility and Measurement of Procalcitonin. Clin Biochem Rev. 2017; 38(2): 59-68. PMCID: PMC5759088
  19. Eschborn S, Weitkamp JH. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Perinatol. 2019; 39(7): 893-903. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0363-4
  20. Chiesa C, Natale F, Pascone R, Osborn JF, Pacifico L, Bonci E, et al. C reactive protein and procalcitonin: reference intervals for preterm and term newborns during the early neonatal period. Clin Chim Acta. 2011; 412(11-12): 1053-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2011.02.020
  21. Fukuzumi N, Osawa K, Sato I, Iwatani S, Ishino R, Hayashi N, et al. Age-specific percentile-based reference curve of serum procalcitonin concentrations in Japanese preterm infants. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 23871. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23871
  22. van Rossum AM, Wulkan RW, Oudesluys-Murphy AM. Procalcitonin as an early marker of infection in neonates and children. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004; 4(10): 620-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01146-6
  23. Qin DJ, Tang ZS, Chen SL, Xu XM, Mao SG, Zhang SF. [Value of combined determination of neutrophil CD64 and procalcitonin in early diagnosis of neonatal bacterial infection]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2017; 19(8): 872-6. PMID: 28774361
  24. Lee J, Bang YH, Lee EH, Choi BM, Hong YS. The influencing factors on procalcitonin values in newborns with noninfectious conditions during the first week of life. Korean J Pediatr. 2017; 60(1): 10-6. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2017.60.1.10
  25. Cao C, Yu M, Chai Y. Pathological alteration and therapeutic implications of sepsis-induced immune cell apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019; 10(10): 782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-2015-1
  26. Bouchon A, Dietrich J, Colonna M. Cutting edge: inflammatory responses can be triggered by TREM-1, a novel receptor expressed on neutrophils and monocytes. J Immunol. 2000; 164(10): 4991-5. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.10.4991
  27. Tammaro A, Derive M, Gibot S, Leemans JC, Florquin S, Dessing MC. TREM-1 and its potential ligands in non-infectious diseases: from biology to clinical perspectives. Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 177: 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.043
  28. Mukherjee S, Huda S, Sinha Babu SP. Toll-like receptor polymorphism in host immune response to infectious diseases: A review. Scand J Immunol. 2019; 90(1): e12771. https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.12771
  29. Dower K, Ellis DK, Saraf K, Jelinsky SA, Lin LL. Innate immune responses to TREM-1 activation: overlap, divergence, and positive and negative cross-talk with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 2008; 180(5): 3520-34. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3520
  30. Zhu H, Li W, Wang Z, Chen J, Ding M, Han L. TREM-1 deficiency attenuates the inflammatory responses in LPS-induced murine endometritis. Microb Biotechnol. 2019; 12(6): 1337-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13467
  31. Dubar M, Carrasco K, Gibot S, Bisson C. Effects of Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS and LR12 peptide on TREM-1 expression by monocytes. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45(7): 799-805. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12925
  32. Gibot S, Massin F, Marcou M, Taylor V, Stidwill R, Wilson P, et al. TREM-1 promotes survival during septic shock in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2007; 37(2): 456-66.
  33. Colonna M, Facchetti F. TREM-1 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells): a new player in acute inflammatory responses. J Infect Dis. 2003; 187 Suppl 2: S397-401. https://doi.org/10.1086/374754
  34. Li C, Zhu L, Gong X, Xu Z, Liu Y, Zhang M, et al. Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 as a useful biomarker for diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia after congenital cardiac surgery in children. Exp Ther Med. 2019; 17(1): 147-52. https://doi.org/10.3892 / etm.2018.6905
  35. Jedynak M, Siemiatkowski A, Mroczko B, Groblewska M, Milewski R, Szmitkowski M. Soluble TREM-1 Serum Level can Early Predict Mortality of Patients with Sepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2018; 66(4): 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-017-0499-x
  36. La Russa R, Maiese A, Viola RV, De Matteis A, Pinchi E, Frati P, et al. Searching for highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for sepsis: State-of-the-art in post-mortem diagnosis of sepsis through immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2019; 33: 2058738419855226. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058738419855226
  37. Qian L, Weng XW, Chen W, Sun CH, Wu J. TREM-1 as a potential therapeutic target in neonatal sepsis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014; 7(7): 1650-8. PMCID: PMC4132125
  38. Garofoli F, Borghesi A, Mazzucchelli I, Tzialla C, Di Comite A, Tinelli C, et al. Preterm newborns are provided with triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010; 23(4): 1297-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/039463201002300439
  39. Adly AA, Ismail EA, Andrawes NG, El-Saadany MA. Circulating soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) as diagnostic and prognostic marker in neonatal sepsis. Cytokine. 2014; 65(2): 184-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2013.11.004
  40. Arizaga-Ballesteros V, Alcorta-Garcia MR, Lazaro-Martinez LC, Amezquita-Gomez JM, Alanis-Cajero JM, Villela L, et al. Can sTREM-1 predict septic shock & death in late-onset neonatal sepsis? A pilot study. Int J Infect Dis. 2015; 30: 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.10.013
  41. Kruchkova OG, Golomidov AV, Velikanova EA, Grigoryev EV. CRP and TREM-1 as early markers of noninfectious systemic inflammatory response in pretern neonates. Medicine in kuzbass. 2016; 15(3): 27-33.
  42. Stein M, Schachter-Davidov A, Babai I, Tasher D, Somekh E. The accuracy of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and s-TREM-1 in the prediction of serious bacterial infection in neonates. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015; 54(5): 439-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922814553435
  43. Alkan Ozdemir S, Ozer EA, Ilhan O, Sutcuoglu S, Tatli M. Diagnostic value of urine soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (sTREM-1) for late-onset neonatal sepsis in infected preterm neonates. J Int Med Res. 2018; 46(4): 1606-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060517749131
  44. Saldir M, Tunc T, Cekmez F, Cetinkaya M, Kalayci T, Fidanci K, et al. Endocan and Soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 as Novel Markers for Neonatal Sepsis. Pediatr Neonatol. 2015; 56(6): 415-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.03.006