ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 28 of 41
JMBS 2017, 2(1): 151–157

Comparative Characteristics of Morphological Feature and Localization of Meiotic Spindle in Human Oocytes before and after Cryopreservation

Buderatska N.1,2, Gontar J.1, Ilyin I.1, Petrushko M.2, Lavrynenko S.1

Using only oocyte morphological parameters is not enough to predict the quality and implantation potential of the future embryo. As well known, the presence of the first polar body is not always a criterion for oocyte maturity. Evidence of oocyte metaphase II stage is the presence of second meiotic division spindle which can be visualized by a polarizing microscope. However, there is no classification of morphological characteristics and localization of meiotic division spindle in the scientific data. This classification would allow predicting oocyte cryoresistance and quality of embryos obtained from them. The disturbances of the meiotic division spindle of metaphase II stage can lead to abnormal segregation of chromosomes after fertilization of cryopreserved oocytes and as a result to aneuploidy of embryos. The aim of this work is to determine the influence of cryopreservation by vitrification method on the morphology and localization of second meiotic division spindle of human oocytes. We have studied and developed a classification of the oocyte’s meiotic spindle apparatus morphological forms and its location relative to the first polar body to achieve this goal. An experimental study was performed on 84 donor oocytes of women who took part in infertility treatment programs by ART. The structure and localization of the meiotic spindle in native and cryopreserved human oocytes was studied using the Oosight polarization system (Hamilton Thorne, USA). The meiotic spindle structure was evaluated and classified. The spindle’s grade characteristics are as follows: A - compact rhomboid spindle with defined edges, B - modified spindle form with blurred edges, C - weak visualization, D - spindle on the 1stpolar body border and cytoplasm (telophase I), E - spindle not visualized, G – increased in a size. The location was graded as the follows: “a” - 0°-20° due to the 1stpolar body, “b”- 21°-45°,“c”- 46° - 90°,“d”- 91° - 180°. The criteria for the morphological features and localization of the meiotic division spindle of human oocytes was first ascertained. After cryopreservation, the survival rate of oocytes was 95.2%. Evaluation of meiotic division spindle morphology enabled us to establish that 45.2% of freshly isolated oocytes had a compact spindle, but after cryopreservation the amount of such oocytes decreased to 28.6%. The decrease in oocyte quantity in the spindle of category A was due to changes in the spindle structure. After cryopreservation, appeared oocytes of category E (with the absence of meiotic spindle) up to 7.1%. This can indicate damage of meiotic spindle. The amount of oocytes with category D spindle (at the telophase stage) which also appeared was 9.5%. This shows premature activation of oocyte after freeze-thawing. After cryopreservation localization changes were found spindle cells in 19 (22.6%). There was a significant decrease in the number of oocytes with a spindle in category a - from 40,5% to 21,4%. It has been established that cryopreservation factors can lead to morphological characteristic changes of second meiotic division spindle and its destruction. It was shown that cryopreservation factors can induce premature oocyte activation which can lead to adverse consequences for the future embryo quality.

Keywords: cryopreservation, vitrification, oocytes, meiotic spindle

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 2.26M

  1. Buderats'ka NO, Petrushko MP. Ootsiti yak al'ternativa yembríonam pri kríokonservuvanní dlya vikoristannya u dopomízhnikh reproduktivnikh tekhnologíyakh. Problemi kríobíologíí̈ í kríomeditsini. 2016; 26 (4): 375–82.
  2. Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Perez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop metod. Fertil Steril. 2008; 89: 1657–64.
  3. Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Use of Cryobanked Oocytes in an Ovum Donation Program: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Obstetrical&Gynecological Survey. 2010; 65: 775-7.
  4. Cooke S, Tyler J, Driscoll G. Meiotic spindle location and identification and its effect on embryonic cleavage plane and early development. Hum Reprod. 2003; 8: 2397–405.
  5. Fang C, Tang M, Li T, Peng WL, Zhou CQ, Zhuang GL, Leong M. Visualization of meiotic spindle and subsequent embryonic development in in vitro and in vivo matured human oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007; 24: 547–51.
  6. Hyslop LA, Blakeley P, Craven L, Richardson J, Fogarty NM, Fragouli Е, Lamb M, Wamaitha SE, Prathalingam N, Zhang Q, O'Keefe H, Takeda Y, Arizzi L, Alfarawati S, et al. Towards clinical application of pronuclear transfer to prevent mitochondrial DNA disease. Nature. 2016; 534: 383–6.
  7. Konc J, Kanyó R, Cseh S. () Visualization and examination of the meiotic spindle in human oocytes with Polscope. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004; 21: 349–53.
  8. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 11 (3): 300– 8.
  9. Larman MG, Minasi MG, Rienzi L, Gardner DK. Maintenance of the meiotic spindle during vitrification in human and mouse oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007; 15 (6): 692–700.
  10. Tilia L, Venetis C, Kilani S, Cooke S, Chapman M. Is oocyte meiotic spindle morphology associated with embryo ploidy? A prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105 (4): 1085–92.
  11. Madaschi С, Souza Bonetti T, Almeida Ferreira Braga D, Pasqualotto F, Iaconelli A, Borge E. Spindle imaging: a marker for embryo development and іmplantation. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 194–8.
  12. Moon J, Hyun C, Lee S, Son W, Yoon S, Lim J. Visualization of the metaphase II meiotic spindle in living human oocytes using the Polscope enables the prediction of embryonic developmental competence after ICSI. Human Reprod. 2003; 18: 817–20.
  13. Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques Ethical, Social, and Policy Considerations. Editors: Anne Claiborne, Rebecca English, and Jeffrey Kahn. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: National Academies Press; 2016. Available from:
  14. Protocol on Embryo Protection A Working Party of the 24th Meeting of the Steering Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe. Report. Strasbourg; 2003. 44p.
  15. Rama Raju GA, Prakash GJ, Krishna KM, Madan K. Meiotic spindle and zona pellucida characteristics as predictors of embryonic development: a preliminary study using PolScope imaging. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007; 14(2): 166–74.
  16. Rienzi L, Martinez F, Ubaldi F, Minasi MG, Iacobelli M, Tesarik J, Greco E. Polscope analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing and thawing procedures. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19 (3): 655–9.
  17. Sathananthan AH, Trounson A, Freemann L, Brady T. The effects of cooling human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1988; 3: 968–77.
  18. Pickering SJ, Braude PR, Johnson MH, Cant A and Currie J. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril. 1990; 54: 102–8.
  19. Wang WH, Meng L, Hackett RJ, Odenbourg R and Keefe DL. Limited recovery of meiotic spindles in living human oocytes after cooling‐rewarming observed using polarized light microscopy. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 2374–8.