ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 53 of 55
Up
JMBS 2022, 7(5): 348–354
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs07.05.348
Physical training and Sport. Theoretical and methodical aspects of physical education and sport

Peculiarities of the Influence of Loads with the Use of Exercises on Simulators and with Free Weight Load on the Development of Maximum Muscle Strength in Bodybuilders

Zhao Jie, Oleshko V. G.
Abstract

The purpose of the work was to study the peculiarities of changes in the indicators of the development of maximum muscle strength in bodybuilders under the conditions of using a complex of exercises on simulators and with free weight load against the background of load modes of different intensity. Materials and methods. 64 bodybuilders aged 20 ± 1.2 years participated in the study. To solve the set purpose, 4 research groups were formed. The duration of the pedagogical experiment was 12 weeks. During the pedagogical experiment, the representatives of the surveyed groups used a set of exercises with free weight load and on simulators against the background of load modes of different intensity. The dynamics of the maximum muscle strength indicators (on the example of the deltoid, biceps and triceps muscles of the shoulder) of athletes in the given conditions of muscle activity was determined in the process of control testing. Results and discussion. It was established that in the course of 12 weeks, in the athletes of groups 1 and 3, who used sets of exercises with free weight load, an increase in strength capabilities under the conditions of moderate intensity loads by 14.8% and 18.7% during high intensity power loads compared to initial data, was observed. It was revealed that among the representatives of groups 2 and 4, who in the course of the pedagogical experiment used a set of exercises on simulators during training, the indicators of the development of the maximum muscle strength of the controlled muscle groups on average show an increase in parameters by 16.5% against the background of the loads of the average intensity (Ra=0.58) and 20.7% – of high intensity loads (Ra=0.71) compared to the results fixed at the beginning of the study. It was investigated that even under the conditions of using a set of exercises with free weight load, but during the mode of high intensity loads, the development of maximum muscle strength of athletes is 2.2% higher, compared to the results recorded during moderate intensity loads on simulators for the same period of time. Conclusion. The use of predominantly strength exercises on simulators in the process of training activities in bodybuilding, especially in conditions of high intensity loads (Ra=0.71) against the background of a small amount of work, contributes to the greatest development of the maximum muscle strength of athletes, compared to the data revealed during control testing of the studied indicators in exercises with free weight load, regardless of the load modes

Keywords: bodybuilding, maximum muscle strength, exercises on simulators, free weight load, intensity, load, athletes

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 260K

References
  1. Aerenhouts D, D'Hondt E. Using Machines or Free Weights for Resistance Training in Novice Males? A Randomized Parallel Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;Oct 26;17(21):7848. PMID: 33114782. PMCID: PMC7662789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217848
  2. Johnen B, Schott N. Feasibility of a machine vs free weight strength training program and its effects on physical performance in nursing home residents: a pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;Jul;30(7):819-828. PMID: 28980220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0830-8
  3. Weakley J, Till K, Read D, Roe G, Darrall-Jones J, Phibbs P, et al. The effects of traditional, superset, and tri-set resistance training structures on perceived intensity and physiological responses. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017;117(9):1877-1889. PMID: 28698987. PMCID: PMC5556132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3680-3
  4. Cintineo H, Freidenreich D, Blaine C, Cardaci T, Pellegrino J, Arent S. Acute Physiological Responses to an Intensity-And Time-Under-Tension-Equated Single- vs. Multiple-Set Resistance Training Bout in Trained Men. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(12):3310-3318. PMID: 30247274. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002872
  5. Chernozub A, Titova A, Dubachinskiy O, Bodnar A, Abramov K, et al. Integral method of quantitative estimation of load capacity in power fitness depending on the conditions of muscular activity and level of training. J Physical Educ Sport. 2018;18(1):217-221. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.01028
  6. Chernozub A, Potop V, Korobeynikov G, Timnea OC, Dubachinskiy O, Ikkert O, et al. Creatinine is a biochemical marker for assessing how untrained people adapt to fitness training loads. Peer J. 2020;May 22;8:e9137. PMID: 32509455. PMCID: PMC7247523. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9137
  7. Shibata K, Takizawa K, Tomabechi N, Nosaka K, Mizuno M. Comparison Between Two Volume-Matched Squat Exercises With and Without Momentary Failure for Changes in Hormones, Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction Strength, and Perceived Muscle Soreness. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(11):3063-3068. PMID: 31356513. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003279
  8. Benavente C, León J, Feriche B, Schoenfeld B, Bonitch-Góngora J, Almeida F, et al. Hormonal and Inflammatory Responses to Hypertrophy-Oriented Resistance Training at Acute Moderate Altitude. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):4233. PMID: 33923577. PMCID: PMC8072638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084233
  9. Shaner A, Vingren J, Hatfield D, Budnar D, Duplanty A, Hill D. The acute hormonal response to free weight and machine weight resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;Apr;28(4):1032-40. PMID: 24276305. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000317
  10. Barnes M, Miller A, Reeve D, Stewart R. Acute Neuromuscular and Endocrine Responses to Two Different Compound Exercises: Squat vs. Deadlift. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;Sep;33(9):2381-2387. PMID: 28704311. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002140
  11. Miller R, Freitas E, Heishman A, Koziol K, Galletti B, Kaur J, et al. Test-Retest Reliability Between Free Weight and Machine-Based Movement Velocities. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Feb;34(2):440-444. PMID: 30199448. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002817
  12. Becker L, Semmlinger L, Rohleder N. Resistance training as an acute stressor in healthy young men: associations with heart rate variability, alpha-amylase, and cortisol levels. Stress. 2021;24(3):318-330. PMID: 32744460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2020.1799193
  13. Martorelli A, De Lima F, Vieira A, Tufano J, Ernesto C, Boullosa D, et al. The interplay between internal and external load parameters during different strength training sessions in resistance-trained men. Eur J Sport Sci. 2021;21(1):16-25. PMID: 32008472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1725646
  14. Schick E, Coburn J, Brown L, Judelson D, Khamoui A, Tran T. A comparison of muscle activation between a Smith machine and free weight bench press. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):779-84. PMID: 20093960. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2237