ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 31 of 33
Up
JMBS 2021, 6(4): 226–230
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs06.04.226
Physical training and Sport. Medical and biological aspects of training athletes

Psychological Characteristics of 16-18-Year-Old Tennis Players

Kichenok N. V.
Abstract

Physical education contributes to the rational solution of practical problems of general health, educational and upbringing nature, taking into account the analysis of the psychological aspects of physical education. Therefore, it is extremely important to study the psychology of tennis players. The comparative analysis revealed that among the respondents with high indicators of success the motivation to success affects the development of self-control, self-esteem, the level of pretensions. In the sample of unsuccessful athletes the level of attempts influences the development of self-esteem, emotional instability, and motivation to avoid failure. Emotional instability of the athlete reduces the level of self-control and motivation to succeed. Within the framework of the study of personal features of tennis players with the highest and lowest indicators of success, we received data that successful athletes are able to manage their feelings, thoughts, actions in conditions of emotional excitement or depression, growing fatigue, unexpected difficulties, failures and other unfavorable factors. The purpose of the study was to define psychological features of the personality of tennis players. Materials and methods. The sample size was 16 people (Irpin Sports School), 8 of them with high success rates (taking into account the results of competitions, the number of victories, the importance of competitions in which they participate), and 8 with low. The age of the subjects varied from 16 to 18 years, the respondents take part in tennis competitions, according to their age category. The following validated methods were used in the study: 1) "Willingness to take risks"; 2) "Self-actualization test"; 3) Diagnosis of personal attitude "Altruism-egoism". Results and discussion. According to the results of the study by the method of "Risk readiness" by Schubert, it was found that tennis players with high success rates of 62.5% have an average level of risk appetite, and 37.5% – a low level. In contrast, athletes with low success rates have an average level of 37.5%, a low level of 50%, and a high level of 12.5%. According to the results of the test "Altruism-egoism" we can see that tennis players with high success rates have a more pronounced selfish tendency (62.5% of respondents), while athletes with low success rates have a selfish tendency in 50%. Conclusion. As a result of the study, we found that the success and failure of the athlete in sports depends on the peculiarities of the personal characteristics of the athlete. The main characteristics of the psychology of a tennis player were also revealed, which helps to expand the knowledge of sports psychology in the field of tennis. This study can be the basis for further theoretical, empirical research, as well as methodological developments in the psychology of professional tennis

Keywords: psychology of sport, tennis, psychology of tennis players, psychological features of a tennis player, psychology of tennis

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 294K

References
  1. Weinberg R. Tennis: Winning the Mental Game. Lynn MA, Zimman HO; 2002.
  2. Ideas I. Instant tennis 2: Winning the mental game. 2011; Infinite Ideas.
  3. Weinberg R, Butt J, Knight B, Burke KL, Jackson A. The relationship between the use and effectiveness of imagery: An exploratory investigation. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2003; 15(1): 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200305398
  4. Aben A, De Wilde L, Hollevoet N, Henriquez C, Vandeweerdt M, Ponnet K, et al. Tennis elbow: associated psychological factors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Mar; 27(3): 387-392. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.033
  5. Broadbent DP, Ford PR, O'Hara DA, Williams AM, Causer J. The effect of a sequential structure of practice for the training of perceptual-cognitive skills in tennis. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 29; 12(3): e0174311. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28355263. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5371311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174311
  6. Cowden RG, Fuller DK, Anshel MH. Psychological predictors of mental toughness in elite tennis: an exploratory study in learned resourcefulness and competitive trait anxiety. Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Dec; 119(3): 661-78. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25387038. https://doi.org/10.2466/30.PMS.119c27z0
  7. Paulhus D, Molin J, Schuchts R. Control profiles of football players, tennis players, and nonathletes. J Soc Psychol. 1979; 108(2): 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1979.9711632
  8. Kilit B, Arslan E. Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. On-Court Tennis Training in Young Tennis Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jan; 33(1): 188-196. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30113920. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002766
  9. Greenleaf C, Gould D, Dieffenbach K. Factors influencing Olympic performance: interviews with Atlanta and Negano US Olympians. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2001; 13(2): 154-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/104132001753149874
  10. Gallo-Salazar C, Del Coso J, Sanz-Rivas D, Fernandez-Fernandez J. Game Activity and Physiological Responses of Young Tennis Players in a Competition With Two Consecutive Matches in a Day. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Jul 1; 14(7): 887-893. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30569784. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0234
  11. Butler R, Hardy, L. The performance profile: theory and application. Sport Psychol. 1992; 6: 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.6.3.253