ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 4 of 59
Up
JMBS 2020, 5(5): 35–44
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs05.05.035
Medicine. Reviews

Review of Classifications and Scoring Systems for Metastatic Spine Tumors Used in Surgical Treatment

Korzh M., Kutsenko V., Perfiliev O., Popov A.
Abstract

It is known that metastases in the spine are detected in more than 70% of cancer patients, and in 10% of such patients, compression of nerve structures and severe neurological disorders develop. The role of surgery for metastatic tumors of the spine is in the focus of attention, since the operation can improve mechanical stability, decompress nerve structures and reduce the intensity of pain. However, what role the operation plays in increasing life expectancy and how to correctly assess the results of treatment remains controversial and the opinions of specialists are controversial, since the assessment is often made by oncologists, but it is the surgeon who more fully evaluates the potential risks and benefits of surgical interventions. Therefore, it is important for surgeons to understand what prognostic factors affect the quality and duration of life. This article presents the most cited classifications and assessments before 2009, as well as all classifications and assessments obtained after 2010 regarding metastatic lesions of the spine, as well as classifications used to develop treatment tactics obtained from the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, articles, monographs, abstracts, dissertations and other sources of scientific and medical information. 57 main publications with II and III levels of evidence were selected, 6 classifications and 24 rating scales were considered. In order to construct the necessary tactics of the surgical strategy, the classification / assessment methods were divided into anatomical classification / assessment methods, neurological symptom / instability assessment methods, and assessment systems for predicting life expectancy. The study showed that in the surgical treatment of metastatic tumors of the spine, it is important to use the same rating scales and classifications to select indications and assess the results of surgical treatment, as well as to achieve meaningful comparisons between published series. Conclusion. The classifications and rating scales used for metastatic lesions of the spine do not fully reflect the type of surgical treatment: there is no algorithm for restoring the support ability of the spine, which is very important for this category of patients

Keywords: spinal metastases, classification of metastatic lesions, decompression-stabilizing operations

Full text: PDF (Rus) 402K

References
  1. Hatrick NC, Lucas JD, Timothy AR, Smith MA. The surgical treatment of metastatic disease of the spine. Radiother Oncol. 2000; 56: 335-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00199-7
  2. Bailar JC, III, Gornik HL. Cancer undefeated. N Eng J Med. 1997; 336: 1569-1574. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199705293362206 PMid:9164814
  3. Jacobs WB, Perrin RG Evaluation and treatment of spinal metastases: an overview. Neurosurg Focus. 2001; 11: Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2001.11.6.11 PMid:16463993
  4. Ibrahim AG, Crockard HA, Antonetti P, Boriani S, Bünger C, Gasbarrini A, et al. Does spinal surgery improve the quality of life for those with extradural (spinal) osseous metastases? An international multi-centre prospective observational study of 223 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 8(3): 271-278. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/8/3/271 PMid:18312079
  5. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T. Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine. 2001; 26: 298-306. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200102010-00016 PMid:11224867
  6. Aebi M. Spinal metastasis in the elderly. Eur Spine J. 2003; 12(Suppl 2): S202-S213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0609-9 PMid:14505120 PMCid:PMC3591831
  7. North RB, LaRocca VR, Schwartz J, North CA, Zahurak M, Davis RF, et al. Surgical management of spinal metastases: analysis of prognostic factors during 10-year experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 2: 564-573. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2005.2.5.0564 PMid:15945430
  8. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Oshima M, Ryu J. A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine. 2005; 30: 2186-2191. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000180401.06919.a5 PMid:16205345
  9. Findlay GF. Adverse effects of the management of malignant spinal cord compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984; 47: 761-768. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.47.8.761 PMid:6470717 PMCid:PMC1027935
  10. Steinmetz MP, Mekhail A, Benzel EC. Management of metastatic tumors of the spine: strategies and operative indications. Neurosurg Focus. 2001; 11(6): e2. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2001.11.6.3 PMid:16463994
  11. Weigel B, Maghsudi M, Neumann C, Kretschmer R, Müller FJ, Nerlich M. Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Post-operative outcome and quality of life. Spine. 1999; 24: 2240-2246. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199911010-00012 PMid:10562991
  12. Young RF, Post EM, King GA. Treatment of spinal epidural metastases. Randomized prospective comparison of laminectomy and radiotherapy. J Neurosurg. 1980; 53: 741-748. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1980.53.6.0741 PMid:7441333
  13. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, Payne R, Saris S, Kryscio RJ, et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005; 366: 643-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66954-1
  14. Wai EK, Finkelstein JA, Tangente RP, Holden L, Chow E, Ford M, et al. Quality of life in surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease. Spine. 2003; 28: 508-512. Wise JJ, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Montgomery D, Kurz LT. Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine. 1999; 24: 1943-1951. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199909150-00014 PMid:10515021
  15. Conti A, Acker G, Kluge A, Loebel F, Kreimeier A, Budach V, et al. Decision Making in Patients With Metastatic Spine. The Role of Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities. Front Oncol. 2019; 9: 915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00915 PMid:31608228 PMCid:PMC6761912
  16. Cooper PR, Errico TJ, Martin R, Crawford B, DiBartolo T. A systematic approach to spinal reconstruction after anterior decompression for neoplastic disease of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery. 1993; 32: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199301000-00001 PMid:8421537
  17. Gokaslan ZL, York JE, Walsh GL, McCutcheon IE, Lang FF, Putnam JB Jr, et al. Transthoracic vertebrectomy for metastatic spinal tumours. J Neurosurg. 1998; 89: 599-609. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0599 PMid:9761054
  18. Sundaresan N, Digiacinto GV, Hughes JE, Cafferty M, Vallejo A. Treatment of neoplastic spinal cord compression: results of a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 1991; 29: 645-650. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199111000-00001 PMid:1961391
  19. Mazel C, Balabaud L, Bennis S, Hansen S. Cervical and thoracic spine tumor management: surgical indications, techniques, and outcomes. Orthop Clin N Am. 2009; 40: 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2008.09.008 PMid:19064057
  20. Maseda M, Uei H, Nakahashi M, Sawada H, Tokuhashi Y. Neurological outcome of treatment for patients with impending paralysis due to epidural spinal cord compression by metastatic spinal tumor. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1): 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1348-x PMid:31481077 PMCid:PMC6724255
  21. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer Metastatic spinal cord compression. Diagnosis and management of adults at risk of and with metastatic spinal cord compression. NICE Guidelines CG75, TJ International Ltd, Cardiff, UK; 2008.
  22. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Toriyama S, Kawano H, Ohsaka S. Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine. 1990; 15: 1110-1113. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199011010-00005 PMid:1702559
  23. Curtin M, Piggott RP, Murphy EP, Munigangaiah S, Baker JF, McCabe JP, et al. Spinal metastatic disease: a review of the role of the multidisciplinary team. Orthop Surg. 2017; 9: 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12334 PMid:28544780 PMCid:PMC6584164
  24. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The Clinical Evaluation of Chemothera- peutic Agents in Cancer. In: MacLeod CM, Ed. Evaluation of Chemo-therapeutic Agents. Columbia: Univ Press; 1949.
  25. Hirabayashi H, Ebara S, Kinoshita T, Yuzawa Y, Nakamura I, Takahashi J, et al. Clinical outcome and survival after palliative surgery for spinal metastases. Cancer. 2003; 97: 476-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11039 PMid:12518372
  26. Hosono N, Ueda T, Tamura D, Aoki Y, Yoshikawa H. Prognostic relevance of clinical symptoms in patients with spinal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 436: 196-201. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000160003.70673.2a PMid:15995441
  27. Bartels RH, Feuth T, van der Maazen R, Verbeek AL, Kappelle AC, André Grotenhuis J, et al. Development of a model with which to predict the life expectancy of patients with spinal epidural metastasis. Cancer. 2007; 110: 2042-2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23002 PMid:17853394
  28. Tatsui H, Onomura T, Morishita S, Oketa M, Inoue T. Survival rates of patients with metastatic spinal cancer after scintigraphic detection of abnormal radioactive accumulation. Spine. 1996; 21: 2143-2148. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199609150-00017 PMid:8893440
  29. van der Linden YM, Dijkstra SP, Vonk EJ, Marijnen CA, Leer JW; Dutch Bone Metastasis Study Group. Prediction of survival in patients with metastases in the spinal column. Cancer. 2005; 103: 320-328. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20756 PMid:15593360
  30. Enkaoua EA, Doursounian L, Chatellier G, Mabesoone F, Aimard T, Saillant G. Vertebral metastases: a critical appreciation of the preoperative prognostic Tokuhashi score in a series of 71 cases. Spine. 1997; 22: 2293-2298. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199710010-00020 PMid:9346151
  31. Spiegel DA, Sampson JH, Richardson WJ, Friedman AH, Rossitch E, Hardaker WT Jr, et al. Metastatic melanoma to the spine. Demographics, risk factors, and prognosis in 114 patients. Spine. 1995; 20: 2141-2146. Sioutos PJ, Arbit E, Meshulam CF, Galicich JH. Spinal metastases from solid tumors. Analysis of factors affecting survival. Cancer. 1995; 76: 1453-1459. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19951015)76:8<1453::AID-CNCR2820760824>3.0.CO;2-T
  32. Zeng JC, Song YM, Liu H, Gong Q, Li T, Liu LM, et al. The predictive value of the Tokuhashi revised scoring system for the survival time of patients with spinal metastases. Sichan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2007; 38: 488-491. [Chinese]
  33. Zou XN, Grejs A, Li HS, Høy K, Hansen ES, Bünger C. Estimation of life expectancy for selecting surgical procedure and predicting prognosis of extradural spinal metastases. Ai Zheng. 2006; 25: 1406-1410.
  34. Choi D, Crockard A, Bunger C, Harms J, Kawahara N, Mazel C, et al. Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: theconsensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group. Eur Spine J. 2010 Feb; 19(2): 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1252-x PMid:20039084 PMCid:PMC2899817
  35. Uei H, Tokuhashi Y, Maseda M. Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients. The Spine Journal. 2017; 42(24): E1446-E1451. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002382 PMid:28816829 PMCid:PMC5708716
  36. Fisher CG, Dipaola CP, Ryken TC, Bilsky MH, Shaffrey CI, Berven SH, et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine. 2010; 35(22): E1221-E1229.
  37. Harrington KD. Metastatic disease of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986; 68A: 1110-1115. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198668070-00025 PMid:3745256
  38. McLain RF, Weinstein JN. Tumors of the spine. Semin Spine Surg. 1990; 2: 157-180.
  39. Enneking WF, Spainer SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcomas. Clin Orthop. 1980; 153: 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198011000-00013
  40. Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R. Primary bone tumors of the spine: terminology and surgical staging. Spine. 1997; 22: 1036-1044. Bilsky MH, Laufer I, Fourney DR, Groff M, Schmidt MH, Varga PP, et al. Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 13(3): 324-328. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09459 PMid:20809724
  41. Aoude A, Fortin M, Aldebeyan S, Ouellet J, Amiot LP, Weber MH, et al. The revised Tokuhashi score; analysis of parameters and assessment of its accuracy in determining survival in patients afflicted with spinal metastasis. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27: 835-840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4921-6 PMid:28012079
  42. Uei H, Tokuhashi Y, Maseda M, Nakahashi M, Sawada H, Matsumoto K, et al. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 1258706. Lun DX, Xu LN, Wang F, Yang XG, Yu XC, Zhang GC, et al. Prognostic Differences in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Spinal Metastases. Orthop Surg. 2019; 11(3): 443-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12470 PMid:31179610 PMCid:PMC6595110
  43. Uei H, Tokuhashi Y, Maseda M. Analysis of the Relationship Between the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (ESCC) Scale and Paralysis Caused by Metastatic Spine Tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(8): E448-E455. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002378 PMid:28816824 PMCid:PMC5895138
  44. Paton GR, Frangou E, Fourney DR. Contempopapy treatment strategy for spinal metestasis: the "LMNOP" system. Can J Neurol Sci. 38: 396-403, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/S031716710001177X PMid:21515496
  45. Ghogawala Z, Mansfield FL, Borges LF. Spinal radiation before surgical decompression adversely affects outcomes of surgery for symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression. Spine. 2001; 26: 818-824. Hikata T, Isogai N, Shiono Y. A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efcacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2017; 30: E1082-e1087. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200104010-00025 PMid:11295906
  46. Choi D, Crockard A, Bunger C, Harms J, Kawahara N, Mazel C, et al. Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: theconsensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group. Eur Spine J. 2010 Feb; 19(2): 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1252-x PMid:20039084 PMCid:PMC2899817
  47. Uei H, Tokuhashi Y, Maseda M. Analysis of the Relationship Between the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (ESCC) Scale and Paralysis Caused by Metastatic Spine Tumors. The Spine Journal. 2018; 43(8): E448-E455. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002378 PMid:28816824 PMCid:PMC5895138
  48. Quraishi NA, Arealis G, Salem KMI, Purushothamdas S, Edwards KL, Boszczyk BM. Te surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors based on an Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (ESCC) scale. The Spine Journal. 2015; 15(8): 1738-1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.040 PMid:25817737
  49. Howell EP, Williamson T, Karikari I, Abd-El-Barr M, Erickson M, Goodwin ML, et al. Total en bloc resection of primary and metastatic spine tumors. Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7(10): 226. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.01.25 PMid:31297391 PMCid:PMC6595209
  50. Igarashi T, Murakami H, Demura S, Kato S, Yoshioka K, Yokogawa N, et al. Risk factors for local recurrence after total en bloc spondylectomy for metastatic spinal tumors: A retrospective study. J Orthop Sci. 2018; 23: 459-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2018.01.004 PMid:29429888
  51. Falicov A, Fisher CG, Sparkes J, Boyd MC, Wing PC, Dvorak MF. Impact of surgical intervention on quality of life in patients with spinal metastases. Spine. 2006; 31: 2849-2856. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000245838.37817.40 PMid:17108840
  52. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996; 37: 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6