ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 17 of 67
Up
JMBS 2020, 5(3): 140–144
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs05.03.140
Experimental Medicine and Morphology

Variant Anatomy of Inconstant Bones of the Human Skull from the IV Verhniy-Saltov Grave Field

Рolstyanoі A. A., Prokhorchuk R. N.
Abstract

The studying of bone remains of modern and fossil populations has always been of great importance to anthropological science, contributing to the study of its various directions. Studying the interplay of osteological features variability allows to characterize the structural type of a group of individuals, as well as to compare intergroup and intragroup variability. The regularities of variability and frequency distribution of variation features in the section of variant anatomy remain important. These features include the inconsistent bones of the skull. The purpose of the work was to study the variant anatomy ofinconstant bones of the human skull on the anthropological materials from the IV Verhniy- Saltov grave field (Ukraine). Material and methods. The research was carried out on 38 skulls currently stored in the Department of Human Anatomy of the V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Results and discussion. 12 skulls (31.5%) had sutural bones, 7 skulls (18.4%) had fontanel bone. Insular bones weren`t present. Inconstant bones were often located in several sutures at once or were combined with a fontanel. The bones of the lambdoid suture were the most common variant of the skull structure. They are present in 8 skulls (21%). The sutura contained 1-5 bones, characterized by elongated, comb-shaped or irregular shape. The bone of the sagittal suture was present in 1 skull (2.6%). It was a single lost bone of an elongated irregular form with size 16×33 mm. It combined with a full metopic (frontal) suture. The bones of the coronal suture were present on 3 skulls (6.8%). The bones of the occipito-mastoid, parieto-mastoid and squamosal sutures were not represented. The fontanel bones on the skulls were most often located in the place of the occipital fontanel. It was present in 4 skulls (10.5%) single, with triangular, quadrangular or irregular shape, sized from 9×20 mm till26 ×35 mm. The bones of parietal fontanel were found in 3 skulls (7.9%), with elongated or irregular shape. Bone sizes were 7-20 mm. The bone of the frontal fontanel was found in 1 skull (2.6%). It was a large bone 13×20 mm, with elongated shape. As well as the interosseous bones, the bones of the sphenoid fontanel and mastoid fontanel were not represented on the osteological material. Conclusion. Thus, the study of craniological material revealed relatively numerous and various discrete-variational features, which were morphologically represented by inconstant skull bones, which were in the structure of 14 skulls (36.8%). For comparison, in modern populations the frequency of this trait is 20-67% The frequency of the sutural bones was 31.6% fontanel bones frequency was 18.4% The obtained results of the craniological study extend and supplement the existing data on the variant anatomy of the inconstant skull bones. Further study of the interrelation of osteological features variability allows us to characterize the structural type of a group of individuals and to compare intergroup and intragroup variability. The restoration of morphological characteristics by osteometric features at the individual level has practical importance in archaeoanthropological reconstruction.

Keywords: variant anatomy, inconstant bones of the skull, Saltov culture, paleoanthropology

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 441K

References
  1. Aksenov VS. Starosaltovskyy katakombnyy mohylʹnyk [Starosaltovsky catacomb burial ground]. Vita antigua. 1999; 2: 137-49. [Russian]
  2. Koloda VV. Issledovaniye rannesrednevekovykh katakombnykh pogrebeniy bliz s. Verkhniy Saltov [A study of early medieval catacomb burials near Verkhniy Saltov]. Khazarskiy al'manakh. 2004; 3: 213-41. [Russian]
  3. Chuchukalo HI. Cherepa iz Verkhne-Saltovskogo mogil'nika [Skulls from the Verkhniy Saltov burial ground]. Trudy Ukrainskogo Psikho-nevrologicheskogo Instituta. Materialy po antropologii Ukrainy. Sbornik vtoroy. 1926; 11 (2). [Russian]
  4. Zaychenko AA, Zhurkin KI. Kosti shvov i rodnichkov svoda cherepa cheloveka [Bones of sutures and fontanelles of the human cranial vault]. Saratovskiy nauchno meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2017; 13(2): 209-12. [Russian]
  5. Grimme H. Gibt es einezer Zusammenhag zwischen Hirns-schadelproportionen und Nahtknochenhaufgkeit? Biol Racsh. 1974; 12(1): 63-4.
  6. Himabindu A. An insight into Wormian bones. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies. 2015; 2: 26-8.
  7. Samson TD, Beals SP, Rekate HL. Massive wormian bone at the cranial apex: identification, correction and outcome. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2008; 19(1); 96-100. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18216671. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e31815c94ad
  8. Speranskiy VS, Zaychenko AI. Forma i konstruktsiya cherepa [The shape and design of the skull]. M: Meditsina; 1980. 280 s. [Russian]
  9. Polstyanoy AO, Fedorchenko MO. Nepostiyni kistky cherepa lyudyny na antropolohichnomu materiali mohylʹnyka saltivsʹkoyi kulʹtury u c. Nova (Chervona) Husarivka [Inconstant Bones of the Human Skull on the Anthropological Materials from the Saltovo-Mayaki Culture Grave Field near Nova (Chervona) Gusarovka Village]. Ukrayinsʹkyy zhurnal medytsyny, biolohiyi ta sportu. 2018; 7(16): 43-7. [Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs03.07.043