ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 53 of 60
Up
JMBS 2019, 4(6): 362–369
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs04.06.362
Physical training and Sport. Medical and biological aspects of training athletes

Analysis of Individual Ways of Compliance Improvement in Obese Patients as an Aspect of Determining Rehabilitation Goals

Aravitska M. G.
Abstract

Despite the effectiveness of diet therapy and increased physical activity to reduce body weight, proven by numerous studies, the question of motivation and the level of compliance with recommendations for the implementation of the developed rehabilitation programs remains open. Therefore, the problem of increasing rehabilitation compliance in obese patients is urgent. The purpose of the study was the analysis of the causes of low rehabilitation compliance and the search for ways to improve it in patients with alimentary–constitutional obesity in the context of defining short and long–term rehabilitation goals. Material and methods. Interviews were conducted with 288 people of the second mature age with nutritional–exogenous obesity of the I–III degree, diagnosed by body mass index. Participants were responsible for asking a questionnaire to determine the causes of low compliance and possible ways to correct it. After one–year rehabilitation period, a retrospective determination of effective methods to increase the level of rehabilitation compliance was carried out. Results and discussion. The most common causes of low compliance were: the difficulty of remembering programs; lack of sharp pain; hunger and fatigue; the difficulty of adapting previous attempts to lose weight to thier usual lifestyle; inefficiency of previous attempts to lose weight. Less common were the lack of support from the family and the others; spending a lot of time on programs; additional financial burden; distrust of non–drug methods of treatment. When identifying possible methods for improving the level of rehabilitation compliance, patients indicated the need for additional information on the course, complications and risks of obesity, principles and mechanisms of the impact of rehabilitation measures; individual approach to specific conditions of life, work, financial status. Patients needed psychological support from a therapist and from family members and those around them, they could implement recommendations to improve their own condition and, thus, solve their problems (aesthetic, personal, career, related to health). When determining the possible duration of body weight correction, most patients considered the annual period of time to achieve the target or desired weight to be optimal. Representatives of all groups had an understanding of lifelong lifestyle control, most often with the morbid form of obesity. In a retrospective analysis of measures to increase compliance, the most effective were frequent personal and constant mobile monitoring by a physical therapist; aesthetic improvement; improvement of well–being; an individual approach to drawing up a rehabilitation program, taking into account personal and financial factors. Self–monitoring diaries, psycho–emotional support, improving personal and family relationships turned out to be less effective. Conclusion. We conducted detailed inquiries in order to find out the reasons for low compliance and methods for improving that allowed us to identify the individual motivation of patients, to determine the short and long–term rehabilitation goals.

Keywords: obesity, compliance, physical therapy, rehabilitation

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 267K

References
  1. Adherence to Long–Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. New–York, WHO, 2003. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/ 9241545992.pdf
  2. Jin J, Sklar GE, Oh MNS, Li SC. Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient's perspective. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008; 4(1): 269–86. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18728716. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S1458
  3. Danylov DS. Terapevtycheskoe sotrudnychestvo (komplaens): soderzhanye, ponjatyja, mekhanyzmы formyrovanyja y metodы optymyzacyy. Nevrologhyja, nejropsykhyatryja, psykhosomatyka. 2014; 2: 4–12. [Russian] https://doi.org/ 10.14412/2074–2711–2014–2–4–12
  4. Hughes DA, Bagust A, Haycox A, Walley T. The impact of non–compliance on the cost–effectiveness of pharmaceuticals: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2001; 10 (7): 601–615. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747044. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/hec.609
  5. Urquhart J, Vrijens B. New findings about patient adherence to prescribed drug dosing regimens: an introduction to pharmionics. Eur J Hospital Pharm Sci. 2005; 11(5): 103–6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15772145. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki066
  6. Cefalu WT, Bray GA, Home PD, Garvey WT, Klein S, Pi–Sunyer FX, et al. Advances in the Science, Treatment, and Prevention of the Disease of Obesity: Reflections From a Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(8): 1567–82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26421334. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4831905. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15–1081
  7. Sturgiss EA, Sargent GM, Haesler E, Rieger E, Douglas K. Therapeutic alliance and obesity management in primary care – a cross–sectional pilot using the Working Alliance Inventory. Clinical Obesity. 2016; 6(6): 376–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27863074. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12167
  8. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation (WHO Technical Report Series 894). Available from: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/obesity/WHO_TRS_894/en
  9. Aravitska MG, Lazarjeva OB. Dynamika jakosti zhyttja khvorykh z ozhyrinnjam pid vplyvom proghramy fizychnoji reabilitaciji. Sportyvna medycyna i fizychna reabilitacija. 2017; 1: 72–78. [Ukrainian]
  10. Lazareva O, Aravitska M, Andrieieva O, Galan Ya, Dotsyuk L. Dynamics of physical activity status in patients with grade І–ІІІ obesity in response to a physical rehabilitation program. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2017; 17(3): 1960–5. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.03193