ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 15 of 50
Up
JMBS 2018, 3(7): 90–95
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs03.07.090
Clinical Medicine

The Role of Neopterin and Biomarkers of Inflammation in the Monitoring оf Treatment Efficacy for Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Hovardovska O. O.
Abstract

Neopterin (2-amino-4-hydroxy6-pteridine) is an indicator of cell-mediated immunity. This biomarker is synthesized by activated monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells that are stimulated by gamma-interferon produced by T-lymphocytes. In Tuberculosis (TB) science neopterin is considered to be a diagnostic marker of this disease, as an indicator of the activation of TB from the latent form, and an indicator for monitoring the effectiveness of anti-TB therapy. Gaptoglobin (GB), ceruloplasmin (CP), and serumucoids (SM) is a complex of biomarkers of inflammation (BI), which, despite their nonspecificity, can reflect the activity of TB process as a process of chronic inflammation, and can also be used to monitor the effectiveness of anti-TB treatment. Literature review shows that the study of the dynamics of the content of neopterin in patients with different treatment effects has not been performed yet. Therefore its role in monitoring the effectiveness of anti-TB therapy remains unclear. The purpose of study was to determine the dynamic of levels of neopterin and biomarkers of inflamation in patients with positive and delayed or/and negative effects of treatment with standard anti-TB treatment regimens, to determine the role of neopterin as a monitoring indicator of treatment efficacy. Materials and methods. 80 patients with pulmonary TB were included in the study. The first group included 30 patients with positive effect to the anti-TB treatment, which had conversion of bacteria excretion after 60 doses of therapy. The second group included 50 patients with delayed or/and negative effects on treatment, that had conversion of bacteria excretion after 90-120 doses of therapy (subgroup A had 30 patients) and had a result of treatment “Failure” after 120 doses (20 patients). The control group consisted of 20 practically healthy persons. The diagnostic samples were carried out in 3 stages: the first was at the beginning of anti-TB treatment; the second was after 60 doses for the first group, after 90-120 doses for the second group; the third was for the first group and the subgroup A at the end of anti-TB treatment, for the subgroup B with determined of the result of "Failure". Results and discussion. The content of neopterin in blood serum was determined by ELISA method with using of the Awareness Technology Stat Fax 303 Plus Microstrip Reader (USA) and standard set of Neopterin-96 reagents manufactured by IBL (Germany). The content of BI was determined by spectrophotometric method on standard sets produced by “Reagent” (Ukraine). Mann-Whitney criterion was used, while significant differences were considered as such at p <0.05. Statistical data processing was performed using Statistica 6.1 software (StatSoft). Significant (p <0.05) increase of all biomarkers was determined at the 1 monitoring stage in both groups of TB patients, in comparison with the control group. Neopterin was higher to 47.5% and 53.2%, GB was to 52.5% and 48.5%, CP was to 52.5% and 45.4%, SM was to 216.9% and 285.7%, in the first and second group, respectively. At the 2 monitoring stage neopterin and BI levels were significant (p <0.05) decrease in the first group. Neopterin decreased on 25.5%, CP was on 24%, GB was on 23.2%, SM was on 36.5%. In the second group there was no such dynamics. At the 3 monitoring stage the levels of the studied indicators approached the norm and did not differ from the control, except CP. In subgroup A levels of all indicators were higher than in first group, and in sugroup B. Conclusions. Positive effect of anti-TB therapy was accompanied by decreasing of neopterin and BI levels. Delayed effect, when bacterial excretion persists and there was a negative x-ray dynamics more than after 2 months of therapy, inflammation and cell immunity parameters were stable. Patients with the result of "Failure" noted a steady increase in neopterin and BI levels. The indicated trends provided an opportunity to propose the study of the dynamics of the content of neopterin and BI, as a marker for monitoring treatment efficacy and early prediction of its failure.

Keywords: pulmonary tuberculosis, neopterin, biomarkers of inflammation, monitoring of treatment, treatment efficacy

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 245K

References
  1. Berdyugina OV, Yershova AV. Issledovanie urovnya neopterina pri raznyih formah tuberkuleznogo vospalitelnogo protsessa. Meditsinkiy Alyans. 2015; 4: 68-72. [Russian]
  2. Esmedlyaeva DS, Dyakova ME, Blum NM, Kartashova TS. Biohimicheskie osobennosti fibrozno-kavernoznogo tuberkuleza razlichnogo geneza. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. 2011; 3: 105-11. [Russian]
  3. Nakaz MOZ Ukrayiny No 620 04.09.2014 «Unifikovanyy klinichnyy protokol pervynnoyi, vtorynnoyi (spetsializovanoyi) ta tretynnoyi (vysokospetsializovanoyi) medychnoyi dopomohy doroslym». [Ukrainian]
  4. Nakaz MOZ Ukrayiny No 1091 21.12.2012 «Pro zatverdzhennya ta vprovadzhennya medyko-tekhnolohichnykh dokumentiv zi standartyzatsiyi medychnoyi dopomohy pry tuberkul'ozi». [Ukrainian]
  5. Titarenko OT, Dyakova ME, Manicheva OA, Esmedlyaeva DS, Dogonadze MZ, Alexeyeva NP, Melnikova NN Biologichrskie svoistva Mycobacterium Tuberculosis i harakteristika vospalitelnogo otveta pri infiltrativnom tuberculoze legkih. Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity. Infektsiya i immunitet. 2014; 4(3): 221–8. [Russian]
  6. Cesur S, Aslan T, Hoca NT, Çimen F, Tarhan G, Çifçi A, Ceyhan İ, Şipit T. Clinical importance of serum neopterin level in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2014 Mar; 3(1): 5-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmyco.2014.01.002
  7. Cok G, Parildar Z, Basol G, Kabaroglu C, Bayindir U, Habif S, Bayindir O. Pleural fluid neopterin levels in tuberculous pleurisy. Clin Biochem. 2007 Aug; 40(12): 876-80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17531216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.04.009
  8. Eisenhut M. Neopterin in Diagnosis and Monitoring of Infectious Diseases. J Biomark. 2013; 2013: 196432. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26317013. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4437389. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/196432
  9. Immanuel C, Rajeswari R, Rahman F, Kumaran PP, Chandrasekaran V, Swamy R. Serial evaluation of serum neopterin in HIV seronegative patients treated for tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Feb; 5(2): 185-90. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11258513
  10. Jeon D. Tuberculous Pleurisy: An Update. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. 2014; 76(4): 153-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24851127. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4021261. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2014.76.4.153
  11. Lacoma A, Prat C, Andreo F, Lores L, Ruiz-Manzano J, Ausina V, et al. Value of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and neopterin in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2011; 6: 157-69. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21468168. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3064422. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S16070
  12. Mendy J, Togun T, Owolabi O, Donkor S, Ota MO, Sutherland JS. C-reactive protein, Neopterin and Beta2 microglobulin levels pre and post TB treatment in The Gambia. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 8; 16: 115. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26951717. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4782376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1447-9
  13. Mohammed KH, Mobasher AA, Yousef AR, Salah A, El-Naggar IZ, Ghoneim AH, et al. BAL neopterin: a novel marker for cell-mediated immunity in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer, Chest. 2001; 119(3): 776–80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11243956. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.119.3.776
  14. Plata-Nazar K, Luczak G, Liberek A, Dudzinska-Gehrmann J, Sznurkowska K, Landowski P, Kaminska B. Evaluation of clinical usefulness of serum neopterin determination in children with bacterial infections. Acta Biochim Pol. 2015; 62(1): 133-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654362. https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2014_893
  15. Prat C, Dominguez J, Andreo F, Blanco S, Pallarés A, Cuchillo F, et al. Procalcitonin and neopterin correlation with aetiology and severity of pneumonia. J Infect. 2006; 52(3): 169-77. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16026842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2005.05.019
  16. Prasanna JS, Sumadhura C, Karunakar P. Neopterin as a diagnostic biomarker for diagnosis of inflammatory diseases like periodontitis. J Oral Res Rev. 2017; 9: 45-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4987.201406
  17. Sigal GB, Segal MR, Mathew A, Jarlsberg L, Wang M, Barbero S, et al. Biomarkers of Tuberculosis Severity and Treatment Effect: A Directed Screen of 70 Host Markers in a Randomized Clinical Trial. EBioMedicine. 2017 Nov; 25: 112-21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100778. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5704068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.10.018
  18. Skogmar S, Schön T, Balcha TT, Sturegård E, Jansson M, Björkman P. Plasma Levels of Neopterin and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Tuberculosis (TB) with and without HIV Coinfection in Relation to CD4 Cell Count. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 2; 10(12): e0144292. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26630153. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4668010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144292
  19. Turgut T, Akbulut H, Deveci F, Kacar C, Muz MH. Serum interleukin-2 and neopterin levels as useful markers for treatment of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006 Aug; 209(4): 321-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16864954. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.209.321
  20. Wafaa SE, Adel SB, Azza MH, Lamiaa RI. Serum neopterin level in cases of pulmonary tuberculosis and pneumonia. Egyptian Journal of Bronchology. 2016; 10: 140-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-8426.184360