ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 21 of 45
Up
УЖМБС 2021, 6(6): 164–170
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs06.06.164
Social medicine and organization of health care

Characteristics of the Relations of Local Government Bodies with Primary Health Care Facilities

Lekhan V. M. 1, Nadutiy K. O. 2, Gritsenko L. O. 1
Abstract

At the current stage of the development of health care systems, it is believed that local governments should be included in any reform plans. The World Health Organisation emphasizes the important role of local governments in reforming primary care while maintaining the primary responsibility for building national central government health systems. The purpose of the study is to characterize the relations of primary health care facilities with local governments by the heads in the context of reforming the health care system in Ukraine and identifying problem areas in them that require improvement. Materials and methods. The study was carried out in two stages: focusing interviewing heads of primary health care facilities with a high level of competence to determine the set of characteristics that form the relationship between of the local governments and primary health care facilities; a survey of 100 heads of primary care facilities using a questionnaire drawn up based on the results of the first stage of the study. Statistical analysis was carried out using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results and discussion. Comprehensive reform of local self-government and primary health care in Ukraine faces certain difficulties and requires coordination of relations between the local governments and primary health care facilities. Twelve main characteristics of the relationship between local governments and primary health care system of the community were identified. Of the total number of respondents, 72% did not give a satisfactory assessment of the competence of the representatives of local governments in the organization of medical services; 36% – the attitude of local governments to primary care facilities; 32% – response of local governments to the needs of primary health care facilities; 78% – understanding by the owner of the contribution of the primary health care to the prosperity of the community; 52% – priority of health development for community; 12% of the respondents noted that their facilities did not receive additional funding from local budgets for the development of the institution and improvement of the quality of medical care. In general, 68% of the surveyed primary health care managers assessed positively the relationship with the owner; 19% – negatively. Conclusion. The study identified problems in the relationship between the local governments and primary care facilities during the reform of the health care system, which need to be addressed. It was revealed that the main problem is the lack of awareness of the local governments of the importance of primary health care for the community, which is primarily due to the low competence of representatives of local authorities on health issues

Keywords: primary health care, local governments, heads of primary health care facilities

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 302K

References
  1. Primary Health Care: Now More Than Ever. The World Health Report. World Health Organization; 2008. 148 р.
  2. Buck D, Wenzel L, Beech J. Communities y and Health. The Kings Published; 2021 May 5. Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/communities-and-health
  3. Rozporyadzhennya Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny № 333-2014-r vid 04.01.2014. Pro skhvalennya Kontseptsiyi reformuvannya mistsevogo samovryaduvannya ta terytorialnoyi organizatsiyi vlady v Ukrayini [On Approval of the Concept for the Reform of Local Self-Government and Territorial Organization of Power in Ukraine]. [Ukrainian]
  4. Zakon Ukrayiny № 2168-VIII vid 10.19.2017. Pro derzhavni finansovi garantiyi medychnogo obslugovuvannya naselennya [About state financial guarantees of medical care of the population]. [Ukrainian]. Available from: https://cutt.ly/hE7tT7y
  5. Batsenko D, Braginskyy P, Buchma M. Yak organizuvaty systemu nadannya pervynnoyi medychnoyi dopomogy na mistsevomu rivni. Operatsiyne kerivnytstvo [How to organize a system for providing primary medical care on a place. Operating guidance]. K: Ministerstvo okhorony zdorov’ya Ukrayiny, Proekt USAID «Reforma VIL-poslug u diyi», TOV «Agentstvo «Ukrayina»; 2018. 368 s. [Ukrainian]
  6. Kvitsinska M Zdorov’ya ukrayintsiv: chy usvidomlyuye mistseva vlada vidpovidalnist? [Health of Ukrainians: Does the local government realize?]. Tsentr spilnykh diy. 07.17.2020. Available from: https://cutt.ly/IE7tnqw [Ukrainian]
  7. Vilenskyy A Programa medychnykh garantiy 2021 v umovakh detsentralizatsiyi [A program of medical guarantees 2021 in conditions of decentralization]. [Ukrainian]. Available from: https://cutt.ly/kE7thzd
  8. Udenta J, Udenta N. Local Government and the Challenges to Primary Healthcare Delivery in Enugu State East Local Government Area Nigeria. Int J Acad Management Sci Res. 2018;2(11):18-33. https://doi.org/10.33094/26410249.2019.12.38.54
  9. Zakon Ukrayiny № 2002-VII vid 06.04.2017. Pro vnesennya zmin do deyakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrayiny shchodo udoskonalennya zakonodavstva z pytan diyalnosti zakladiv okhorony zdorov’ya [On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on improving the legislation on the activities of health care institutions]. [Ukrainian]