ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 34 of 67
Up
УЖМБС 2020, 5(4): 256–264
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs05.04.256
Dentistry

Comparative Evaluation of Healing the Oral Mucosa after Using Different Methods of Connection and Hemostasis

Boiko M. A.
Abstract

Due to the rapid development of scientific and technological progress, there are new methods of connecting tissues and ceasing bleeding. The fact that surgical interventions in the oral cavity are potentially infectious, they cause postoperative complications. Important aspects of each intervention in oral surgery are minimally invasive, speed, quality and ergonomics of each technical element of the operation. Accordingly, the result of surgical treatment will depend on the chosen technique. The purpose of the work was to study the influence of different methods of connection and hemostasis on the oral mucosa, to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Material and methods. We examined and treated 40 patients of different sex aged 55-63, who were in the stage of surgical preparation for prosthetics with removable dentures and required removal of the sharp edges of the jaw bone. An open alveolectomy operation was performed and divided patients into 4 groups with 10 people in each group. The main group (radio frequency electric welding) and three control groups were selected. The first group had suture (Polyamide 3/0 seams), the 2nd group had suture (Polyester 3/0 seams) and the 3rd group had medical adhesive composition («Tisuacryl»). To determine the intensity of pain, a visual analog scale was chosen. The intensity of wound healing was assessed according to the REEDA scale and local thermometry. Statistical data processing was performed using the program STATISTICA 13, the difference was considered significant with a probability of statistical error p ≤ 0.05. Results and discussion. On the 3rd day, the reliability of the score relative to pain in the main group was 1.0±0.5 (p <0.05) in relation to the control group 1, 2.5±0.5 (p <0.05) in relation to the control group 2 and 0.5±0.5 (p <0.05) in relation to the control group 3. According to the indicators of wound healing, it was found that for 3 days after the intervention according to the REEDA scale, the total score in the main group was significantly different and amounted to 5.0±0.5 (p <0.05) compared to the control group 1.9±0.5 (p <0.05) compared to the control group 2, and 1±0.5 (p <0.05) compared to the control group 3. This indicated the advantage of the connection method and hemostasis, which was used in the main group. The lowest total score corresponded to the speed of healing and the course of the wound processing. In the main group it was 7 points (16%), in the comparison group 1 it was 12 points (28%), in comparison group 2 it was 16 points (37%) and in group 3 it amounted to 8 points (19%). Conclusion. According to the results of the study, the method of radio frequency electric welding and adhesive medical composition had the best indicators of wound healing and the postoperative period in comparison with suture materials.

Keywords: oral mucosa, radio frequency electric welding, suture method, adhesive composition, healing

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 425K

References
  1. Pavlenko OV. Shlyakhy reformuvannya systemy nadannya stomatologichnoyi dopomogy naselennyu Ukrayiny [Ways to reform the dental care system in Ukraine]. Sovremennaya stomatologyya. 2013; 4: 180-4. [Ukrainian]
  2. Voronenko YuV, Pavlenko OV, Mazur IP, Eds. Stomatologichna dopomoga v Ukrayini: osnovni pokaznyky diyalnosti za 2008-2018 r [Dental care in Ukraine: key performance indicators for 2008-2018]. Kropyvnytskyy: Polium; 2018. 216 p. [Ukrainian]
  3. Timofeev AA. Rukovodstvo po cheljustno-licevoj hirurgii i hirurgicheskoj stomatologii [Guide to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery]. Kiev: Chervona Ruta Turs; 2012. 1048 p. [Russian]
  4. Kirsanova NM, Lomakin MV, Soloshhanskij II. Obshhie i chastnye voprosy gemostaza v rekonstruktivnoj hirurgii polosti rta [General and specific issues of hemostasis in reconstructive surgery of the oral cavity]. Rosijskij stomatologicheskij zhurnal. 2018; 22(4): 212-6. [Russian]
  5. Vaaka PH, Patlolla BR, Donga SK, Ganapathi AK, Kurapati V. Cyanoacrylate: an alternative to silk sutures: a comparative clinical study. J NTR Univ Health Sci. 2018; 7: 108-14. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-8632.233838
  6. Madhiraju BM, Sheethi KV. A comparative evaluation of fibrin glue visa-vis' conventional sutures in periodontal flap surgeries - A case series. Journal of Indian Dental Association. 2014; 8(3): 8-14.
  7. Zakeri M, Arjmand N, Forouzanfar A, Zakeri M, Koohestanian N. Nano-silver suture as a new application for healing of periodontal flaps. Int J Dent Oral Health. 2016; 7: 1-5.
  8. Tymofieiev OO. Profilaktyka hniino-zapalnykh uskladnen u khirurhichnii stomatolohii ta shchelepno-lytsevii khirurhii [Prevention of purulent-inflammatory complications in surgical dentistry and maxillofacial surgery]. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2015; 5: 44-7. [Ukrainian]
  9. Javed F, Al-Askar M, Almas K, Romanos GE, Al-Hezaimi K. Tissue reactions to various suture materials used in oral surgical interventions. ISRN Dent. 2012; 2012: 762095. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/762095. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22645688. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3356909
  10. Kosakivska IA. Vykorystannya elektrotermoadgeziyi pry khirurgichnykh vtruchannyakh z pryvodu zakhvoryuvan limfatychnogo kiltsya glotky u ditey [The use of electrothermadhesion in surgical interventions for diseases of the lymphatic ring of the pharynx in children]. Klinichna khirurgiya. 2017; 2: 31-3. [Ukrainian]
  11. Bulavin LA, Abyzov RA, Vergun LYu, Onyshchenko YuI. Perevagy metodu elektrozvaryuvannya pry likuvanni khvorykh na rak gortani seredynnoi lokalizatsiyi (St. T1-T2) [The advantages of the method of electric welding in the treatment of patients with laryngeal cancer of midline localization (St. T1-T2)]. Medychna informatyka ta inzheneriya. 2015; 1: 28-32. [Ukrainian]
  12. Khudetskyi IIu, Kamalov RKh, Ponomarenko VO, Sukhin IA. Optymizatsiya medyko-tekhnichnykh kharakterystyk bagatofunktsionalnykh termokhirurgichnykh aparativ dlya stomatologiyi [Optimization of medical and technical characteristics of multifunctional thermosurgical devices for dentistry]. Problemy viiskovoi okhorony zdorovia. 2013; 36: 225-9. [Ukrainian]
  13. Kosakivska IA, Vatlytsov DV, Andriyash VV. Vplyv elektrotermoadgeziyi na zhyvi klityny v eksperymenti [The effect of electrothermal adhesion on living cells in the experiment]. Zb nauk prats spivrobitn NMAPO im PL Shupyka. 2015; 24(kn 2): 88-94. [Ukrainian]
  14. Kosakivska IA. Doslidzhennya bakterytsydnoi diyi vysokochastotnogo strumu v eksperymenti [Investigation of the bactericidal action of high-frequency current in the experiment]. Zhurnal vushnykh, nosovykh i gorlovykh khvorob. 2017; 5: 82-7. [Ukrainian]
  15. Patent 140358 Ukraine, МПК A61B 18/12 (2006.01). Elektrokhirurgichnyy zatyskach dlya bipolyarnogo vysokochastotnogo zvaryuvannya slyzovoi obolonky ta m'yakykh tkanyn v zadnikh ta bichnykh viddilakh porozhnyny rota [Electrosurgical clamp for bipolar high frequency welding of mucous and soft tissues in rear and side rears] / Boyko MA, Nikritin OL, Khudetskyy IYu. (UA); zayavnik i vlasnik patentu Natsionalna medychna akademiya pislyadyplomnoi osvity imeni PL Shupyka (UA). №. u201905911; zayavl 29.05.2019 ; opubl 25.02.2020. Byul № 4. [Ukrainian]
  16. Singh PK, Degala S, Shetty S, Rai VS, Das A. To Evaluate the Efficacy and Effectiveness of N-butyl-2- cyanoacrylate glue (TRU SEAL) in Closure of Oral and Maxillofacial Laceration and Surgical Incisions. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019; 18(1): 131-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1111-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728704. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6328818