ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 26 of 67
Up
УЖМБС 2020, 5(3): 201–207
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs05.03.201
Clinical Medicine

State of the Problem Atypical Course of Traumatic Disease in Patients with Severe Condition at the Time of Admission

Matvieienko M. 1, Belozorov I. 1, Volkova Y. 2
Abstract

Direct traumatic injuries and operative stress associated with each surgery should be considered as aggression in the conditions of multiple trauma. Pronounced stress response due to major surgery can deplete the already weakened metabolic reserves of the body. The purpose of the study was to evaluate operative stress as part of many stages of operational correction for the Damage Control on the background of pre-existing traumatic disease as a predictor of hospital complications in patients with polytrauma. Material and methods. 224 patients with multiple traumas, ISS >15 points, class III-IV blood loss according to the classification of the American College of Surgeons, temperature core body 34-36 o C, age 18 to 60 years, absence of severe traumatic brain injury were studied. Patients were different in terms of time and volume of surgery and were divided into 2 groups according these criteria. The first group included 104 patients, who underwent surgery in full within the first 24 hours after admission. The second group included 120 patients. They needed one or more additional operations. All their injuries were repaired using multi-stage surgical correction. Results and discussion. On admission to the hospital, all of patients, regardless of the specific set of injuries, did not differ significantly in the severity of injuries, physiological deteriorations (p >0,05). In this case, patients were considered severely unstable (according to the ISS, RTS, Military field surgery scales), with a predicted maximum mortality rate of 33% (according to the Military field surgery and TRISS, PTS, APACHE II scales) for both groups and level of expected complications 34% (Military field surgery). The level of complications was significantly higher in the second group than in the first group. Post-traumatic nephropathy was diagnosed in 25 patients (24%) of the first group and 46 patients (38%) of second group. Infectious complications were found in group I in 31% of cases, group II had 51% of cases. In the first group, the total number of thrombohemorrhagic complications was 16%, in the second group it was 29%. Conclusion. In patients of the second group who underwent a number of additional surgical interventions according to the tactics of multi-stage surgical correction, the level of complications was more than 1.5 times higher than the first group (р˂0,05). Therefore, every subsequent surgery destroys the conventional notion of a classic traumatic disease course.

Keywords: multi-stage surgical correction, complications, polytrauma

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 214K

References
  1. Giannoudis PV, Giannoudis VP, Horwitz DS. Time to think outside the box: 'Prompt-Individualised-Safe Management' (PR.I.S.M.) should prevail in patients with multiple injuries. Injury. 2017 Jul; 48(7): 1279-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28551051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.026
  2. Roberts DJ, Chad GB, David VF, Moore EE, Ivatury RR, Lucas ChE, et al. History of the Innovation of Damage Control for Management of Trauma Patients: 1902-2016. Annals of Surgery. 2017 May; 265(5): 1034-44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27232248. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001803
  3. Vaglio S, Prisco D, Biancofiore G, Rafanelli D, Antonioli P, Lisanti M, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of a Patient Blood Management programme. Application to elective major orthopaedic surgery in adults. Blood Transfus. 2016 Dec; 14(1): 23-65. https://doi.org/10.2450/2015.0172-15
  4. Golub IE, Sorokina LV. Khirurgicheskiy stress i obezbolivanie [Surgical stress and analgesia]. Irkutsk: Publishing house of IGMU; 2005. 201 p. [Russian]
  5. Ilyukevich GV, Koloshka LR, Hancharou AY, Permyakov IV. Regionarnaya anesteziya i immunnyy komponent stress-otveta v onkokhirurgii [Regional anesthesia and the immune component stress response in oncosurgery]. Medical journal. 2018 Jan; 2: 7-12. [Russian]
  6. Yurin RI, Glushchenko VA, Mikhnin AE, Levchenko EV. Markery operatsionnogo stressa pri sravnenii torakoskopicheskikh i torakotomicheskikh rezektsiy pri rake legkogo [Markers of surgery stress in comparison of thoracoscopic and thoracotomic resections in lung cancer]. Oncology issues. 2017: 63(2): 199-207. [Russian]
  7. Abdelmalak BB, You J, Kurz A, Kot M, Th. Bralliar, F.H. Remzi, et al. The effects of dexamethasone, light anesthesia, and tight glucose control on postoperative fatigue and quality of life after major noncardiac surgery: A randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug; 55: 83-91. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30599425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.038
  8. Alazawi W, Pirmadjid N, Lahiri R, Bhattacharya S. Inflammatory and Immune Responses to Surgery and Their Clinical Impact. Annals of Surgery. 2016 July; 264(1): 73-80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27275778. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001691
  9. Cowen R, Stasiowska MK, Laycock H, Bantel C. Assessing pain objectively: the use of physiological markers. Anaesthesia. 2015 Jan; 70(7): 828-47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25772783. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13018
  10. Smajic J, Tupkovic LR, Husic S, Avdagic SS, Hodzic S, Imamovic S. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Surgical Patients. Med Arch. 2018 Apr; 72(2): 116-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736100. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5911168. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2018.72.116-119
  11. Watt DG, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Routine clinical markers of the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response after elective operation: a systematic review. Surgery. 2015 Feb; 157: 362-80.
  12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25616950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.09.009
  13. Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Achtari C, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part II. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb; 140(2): 323-32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26757238. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6038804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019
  14. Namas RA, Vodovotz Y, Almahmoud K, Abdul-Malak O, Zaaqoq A, Namas R, et al. Temporal Patterns of Circulating Inflammation Biomarker Networks Differentiate Susceptibility to Nosocomial Infection Following Blunt Trauma in Humans. Ann Surg. 2016 Jan; 263(1): 191-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25371118. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5136774. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001001
  15. Pape HC. Effects of changing strategies of fracture fixation on immunologic changes and systemic complications after multiple trauma: damage control orthopedic surgery. J Orthop Res. 2008 Nov; 26(11): 1478-84. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18524013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20697
  16. Pape H. Damage-Control Orthopaedic Surgery in Polytrauma: Influence on the Clinical Course and Its Pathogenetic Background. In: Bentley G. (eds) European Instructional Course Lecture. Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2009; 9: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00966-2_8
  17. Vallier HA, Wang X, Moore TA, Wilber JH, Como JJ. Timing of orthopedic surgery in multiple trauma patients: development of a protocol for early appropriate care. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Oct; 27(10): 543-51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23760182. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829efda1
  18. Flohé S, Flohé SB, Schade FU, Waydhas C. Immune response of severely injured patients--influence of surgical intervention and therapeutic impact. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2007 Sep; 392(5): 639-48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17605036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-007-0203-4
  19. Prin M, Li G. Complications and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients treated in intensive care units in the United States, 2013. Injury Epidemiolog. 2016; 3(18): 2-10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747555. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4974260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-016-0084-5
  20. Matvieienko M, Baranova N, Matvieienko S, Kozlova T, Gryshchenko A, Sukesh A. Аnalysis of acute and early periods complications of traumatic disease in severe polytrauma. The Journal of VN Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Medicine. 2019 Sep; 38: 49-55. https://doi.org/10.26565/2313-6693-2019-38-06
  21. Pape H-C, Leenen L, Velmahos GD, Buckley R, Giannoudis PV. Timing of major fracture care in polytrauma patients - An update on principles, parameters and strategies for 2020. Injury. 2019; 50(10): 1656-70. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.09.021
  22. Guerado E, Bertrand ML, Cano JR, Cerván AM, Galán A. Damage control orthopaedics: State of the art. World J Orthop. 2019 Jan; 10(1): 1-13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30705836. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6354106. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i1.1