ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 19 of 60
Up
УЖМБС 2019, 4(6): 134–141
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs04.06.134
Clinical Medicine

Peculiarities of Perinatal Assessment and the State of Vegetative Regulation of Heart Activity in Newborns after Hypoxia

Gonchar M., Ivanova Ye., Kondratova I., Komova V.
Abstract

Assessment of heart rate variability is a method of evaluating the state of mechanisms of the body physiological functions regulation. The processes of autonomic control in newborns are influenced by various factors, but hypoxia leads to the most influential damage to the central nervous regulation of cardiac activity. The purpose of the study was to determine the state of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity in newborns after hypoxia by examining heart rate variability and analyzing adverse perinatal factors in this group of patients. Material and methods. 187 newborns were examined in the early neonatal period. The study involved assessment of medical records, daily monitoring of ECG according to Holter with determination of the main temporal indicators of heart rate variability and statistical processing. Results and discussion. Depending on the Apgar scale at the 1st minute, the children were divided into 2 main groups: newborns with Apgar score less than 6 points which comprised the 1st group (n=132), newborns with Apgar score of 7 points or more were included into the 2nd group (n=55). Depending on the gestational peculiarities at birth, children were subdivided into subgroups of full–term and preterm infants: group 1a (n=15) were full–term infants with hypoxia at birth, group 1b (n=117) were premature newborns with hypoxia at birth, group 2a (n=43) were full–term neonates without hypoxia at birth, group 2b (n=12) were prematurely born without hypoxia at birth. Most mothers of newborns of group 1 had complications of obstetric and gynecological character, which became a risk factor for hypoxic events (RR=3.823, 95 % CI (2.061; 7.092), χ2=53.272; p <0.001). Full–term infants of group 1 had the lowest Apgar scores and umbilical cord pH (p <0.02 and p <0.0001, respectively), which was reflected in a greater percentage of severe hypoxic central nervous system damage. According to Holter, 75 % of newborns in group 1 were diagnosed with various types of disturbances of cardiac rhythm and conduction. The temporal parameters of heart rate variability were lower in the group of infants who had hypoxia, with the lowest in the group of preterm infants. Conclusions. Newborns with hypoxia have a decrease in heart rate variability temporal parameters compared to infants without hypoxia, with the lowest rates in the preterm group. Evaluation of RMSSD and PNN50 can be used to predict the risk of developing neonatal arrhythmias in premature infants who underwent hypoxia and had impaired adaptation at birth.

Keywords: heart rate variability, newborns, posthypoxic myocardium

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 267K

References
  1. Yan Zeng, Yehui Lv, Li Tao, Jianlong Ma, Heng Zhang, Hongmei Xu, et al. G6PC3, ALDOA and CS induction accompanies mir–122 down–regulation in the mechanical asphyxia and can serve as hypoxia biomarkers Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 15; 7(46): 74526–74536. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27793029. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5342684. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12931
  2. Zhang W, Lu M, Zhang Ch, Zhang R, Ou X, Zhou J, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia increases the risk of cardiac arrhythmia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: A meta–analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (3): e0173006. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273115. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5342232. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173006
  3. Weiner OM, McGrath JJ. Test–Retest Reliability of Pediatric Heart Rate Variability: A Meta–Analysis. McGrath Psychophysiol. 2017 Jan; 31(1): 6–28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29307951. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5756082. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269–8803/a000161
  4. Javorka K, Lehotska Z, Kozar M, Uhrikova Z, Kolarovszki B, et al. Heart Rate Variability in Newborns. Review. Physiol Res. 2017; 66 (2): S203–14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937235
  5. Sullivan BA, Grice SM, Lake DE, Moorman JR, Fairchild KD. Infection and other clinical correlates of abnormal heart rate characteristics in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2014; 164(4): 775–80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24412138. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3962693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.11.038
  6. Oliveira V, Martins R, Liow N, Teiserskas J, von Rosenberg W, Adjei T, et al. Prognostic Accuracy of Heart Rate Variability Analysis in Neonatal Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review. Neonatology. 2019; 115: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493002
  7. Kozar M, Tonhajzerova I, Mestanik M, Matasova K, Zibolen M, Calkovska A, et al. Heart rate variability in healthy term newborns is related to delivery mode: a prospective observational study. Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 264. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945544. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6020381. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884–018–1900–4
  8. Russell NE, Higgins MF, Kinsley BF, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM. Heart rate variability in neonates of type 1 diabetic pregnancy. Early Hum Dev. 2016; 92: 51–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.11.003
  9. Gonçalves H, Amorim–Costa C, Ayres–de–Campos D, Bernardes J. Evolution of linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate indices throughout pregnancy in appropriate, small for gestational age and preterm fetuses: A cohort study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018; 153: 191–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29157452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.10.015
  10. Cardoso S, Silva MJ, Guimarães H. Autonomic nervous system in newborns: a review based on heart rate variability. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017; 33(7): 1053–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381–017–3436–8
  11. Mulkey SB, Kota S, Swisher CB, Hitchings L, Metzler M, Wang Y, et al. Autonomic nervous system depression at term in neurologically normal premature infants. Early Hum Dev. 2018; 123: 11–6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30025221. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6136650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.07.003