Any type of denture, but primarily removable, is an alien object and represents a complex of inappropriate stimuli for the oral cavity. During orthopedic treatment, the prosthesis is an irritating factor in the oral cavity, adaptation of which may have a long period and cause a steady negative attitude to it. One of the most common complications in orthopedic dentistry is prosthetic stomatitis of allergic origin. In this case, contact allergic reactions are aggravated by various factors of endogenous and exogenous origin, including individual high sensitivity to plastics. Material and methods. To research the problem of complications in removable prosthetics we studied and analyzed 39 professional literary sources, 22 of them were domestic and 17 foreign. Results and discussion. The study showed that the imposition of removable dentures led to a sharp increase in microbial contamination of the oral cavity and the appearance of pathogenic strains. Favorable conditions for the penetration of microorganisms into the mucous membrane of the oral cavity is to increase its permeability due to the temperature increase in the area of the prosthetic bed and the violation of heat transfer processes, as well as through mechanically damaged mucus as a result of roughness and nonhomogeneity of the plastic. One of the important barriers to getting used to dentures is the lack of functional activity of the salivary glands. 2 mechanisms of violation of adaptation to removable dentures are considered in case of dryness of the mucous membrane of the oral cavity: violation of the homeostasis of the oral cavity and decreased ceratization of the prosthetic mucosa. In case of dry mucous membranes of the oral cavity it is practically impossible to find a dental prosthesis in the oral cavity without experiencing discomfort. Conclusion. Despite the achievements of modern dentistry (the development of new technologies, the emergence of new generations of materials), the multifactorial influence of structural material on the organs and tissues of the oral cavity and the patient's body is still not taken into account. Because of the reduced ability of tissues of the prosthetic bed to load, more than 50% of patients do not use removable dentures. Therefore, the development of treatment prophylactic schemes for the elimination of complications with permanent prosthetics is an urgent task of modern dentistry.

Keywords: orthopedic dentistry, removable prosthetics, complications

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 214K

1. Vasilenko RE. Sravnitelnye fiziko-mekhanicheskie i prochnostnye kharakteristiki armirovannykh i nearmirovannykh polnykh semnykh plastinochnykh protezov verkhney chelyusti. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2015; 3: 94-7. [Russian]
2. Davydenko HM, Tsvetkova NV, Davydenko VYu. Osoblyvosti vidnovlennya zhuvalnoi efektyvnosti znimnymy plastynkovymy protezamy u khvorykh na tsukrovyi diabet. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2014; 5: 45-6. [Ukrainian]
3. Dvornyk VM. Suchasni pohlyady na mekhanizm adaptatsiyi do riznykh konstruktsiy zubnykh proteziv. Dentalnye tekhnolohyi. 2011; 3: .29-31. [Ukrainian]
4. Dieva TV. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti razrabotki otechestvennykh adgezivnykh sredstv dlya fiksatsii polnykh syomnykh plastinochnykh protezov. Visnik stomatologiyi. 2013; 2: 34-6. [Russian]
5. Doroshenko SI, Saranchuk OV. Imunnyi status porozhnyny rota iz zakhvoryuvannyamy porozhnyny rota na tli zuboshchelepnykh anomaliy ta tsukrovoho diabetu I typu. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi visnyk. 2011; 5: 23-7. [Ukrainian]
6. Mykhaylenko TM, Rozhko MM. Klinichne vyvchennya ta vzayemozv’yazok stanu hihiyeny rotovoi porozhnyny z inshymy skladovymy zuboshchelepnoi systemy v osib zi znimnymy konstruktsiyamy zubnykh proteziv. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2011; 6: 35-8. [Ukrainian]
7. Nespryadko VP, Medvinska NI. Alhorytm doslidzhennya patsiyentiv z porushennyamy adaptatsiyi do zubnykh proteziv. Dentalnye tekhnolohyi. 2013; 2-3: 52-8. [Ukrainian]
8. Nykyforchyn UR. Kliniko-laboratorne obgruntuvannya rannoi diahnostyky, medykamentoznoho likuvannya ta profilaktyky infektsiyno-alerhichnykh staniv slyzovoi obolonky rotovoi porozhnyny u patsiyentiv, shcho korystuyutsya znimnymy konstruktsiyamy zubnykh proteziv: Abstr. PhDr. (Med.). Ivano-Frankivsk, 2007. 20 p. [Ukrainian]
9. Nidzelskyi MYa, Krynychko LR. Analitychnyi ohlyad reaktsiy tkanyn rotovoi porozhnyny na znimni zubni akrylovi protezy pry yikh korystuvanni. Problemy ekolohiyi ta medytsyny. 2015; 14(3): 8-11. [Ukrainian]
10. Nidzelskyi MYa, Davydenko VYu, Davydenko HM, Kuznetsov VV, Sokolovska VM. Porivnyalna kharakterystyka rivnya zalyshkovoho monomeru v bazysakh znimnykh proteziv iz akrylovykh plastmas, vyhotovlenykh za riznymy tekhnolohiyamy polimeryzatsiyi. Bulletin of suchasnoi medytsyny. 2015; 3(2): 55-8. [Ukrainian]
11. Nidzelskyi MYa, Krynychko LR. Strukturni zminy poverkhni v povnykh znimnykh stomatolohichnykh protezakh, vyhotovlenykh iz akrylovykh plastmas, u protsesi korystuvannya nymy, za danymy elektronnoi mikroskopiyi. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2013; 2: 10-1. [Ukrainian]
12. Pavlenko OV, Doroshenko OM. Profilaktyka uskladnen pislya ortopedychnoho likuvannya znimnymy protezamy. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2010; 6: 39-42. [Ukrainian]
13. Paliychuk VI, Rozhko MM, Paliychuk IV. Vyvchennya adhezyvnykh vlastyvostey mikroflory rotovoi porozhnyny do bazysnykh materialiv znimnykh proteziv. Materialy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsiyi «Innovatsiyni tekhnolohiyi v stomatolohiyi». Ternopil, 21 zhovtnya 2011. M- vo okhorony zdorov’ya Ukrainy, DVNZ «Ternopilskyi derzhavnyi med un-t im IYa Horbachevskoho». 2011: 44. [Ukrainian]
14. Potapchuk AM, Lokota YuYe, Shvets IS. Analiz zmin mikrotsyrkulyatsiyi krovi v tkanynakh proteznoho lozha v protsesi korystuvannya povnymy znimnymy protezamy. Innovatsiyi v stomatolohiyi. 2015; 4: 53-6. [Ukrainian]
15. Rozhko MM, Nespryadko VP. Ortopedychna stomatolohiya. K: Knyha plyus; 2003. 552 p. [Ukrainian]
16. Sadykov MI, Nesterov AM. Modernizirovannyi bazisnyi material dlya izhotovleniya semnykh zubnykh protezov. Ukrainskiy stomatolohichniy almanakh. 2012; 1: 6-12. [Russian]
17. Sulemova RKh, Ogorodnikov MYu, Tsarev VN. Kliniko-mikrobiologicheskaya kharakteristika dinamiki mikrobnoy kolonizatsii semnykh zubnykh protezov s bazisami iz poliuretana i akrilovykh plastmass. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2012; 6: 20-2. [Russian]
18. Tomilina TV. Kvartsetyn pidvyshchuye nespetsyfichnyi imunitet i znyzhuye dysbioz i zapalennya v parodonti shchuriv, yaki otrymuvaly antykhelikobakternu terapiyu. Visnyk stomatolohiyi. 2015; 1: 24-7. [Ukrainian]
19. Fastovets OO, Kotelevskyi RA, Kryzhanovskyi AYe. Doslidzhennya zmin mikrotsyrkulyatsiyi krovi v tkanynakh proteznoho lozha pry korystuvanni povnymy znimnymy protezamy. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2013; 4: 248-55. [Ukrainian]
20. Shuturminskyi VH. Pokrashchennya adaptatsiyi do proteziv iz bezakrylovoi plastmasy za dopomohoyu adaptatsiynoho helyu. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2009; 4: 28-9. [Ukrainian]
21. Yanyshen YV. Klynycheskoe yzuchenye zhevatelnoho davlenyya na etapakh ortopedycheskoho lechenyya semnymy protezamy. Nauka y zdravookhranenye. Kazakhstan. 2015; 3: 70-9. [Russian]
22. Yanishen IV. Prychyny znyzhennya yakosti ta yiyi prohnozuvannya na etapakh klinichnoi ekspluatatsiyi znimnykh konstruktsiy zubnykh proteziv. Bulletin of suchasnoi medytsyny. 2014; 4(115); 238-52. [Ukrainian]
23. Basker RM, Davenport JC, Thomason JM. Prosthetic treatment of the edentulous patient. 5th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 44–54.
24. Bogucki ZA, Kownacka M. Elastic dental prostheses - alternative solutions for patients using acrylic prostheses: Literature review. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Jul 31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30063127. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/70044
25. Bertolini M, Cavalcanti Y, Bodrin D, Silva W. Candida albicans biofilms and MMA surface treatment influence the adhesion of soft denture liners to PMMA resin. Braz Oral Res (São Paulo). 2014; 28(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013005000025
26. Pradies G, Sanz I, Evans O, Martnez F, Sanz M. Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22(4): 361-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19639073
27. Critchlow SB, Ellis JS. Prognostic indicators for conventional complete denture therapy: A review of the literature. J Dent. 2012; 38(1): 2-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19695302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.004
28. Nakudashvili Z, Barabakadze I, Machavariani M, Enukidze M, Delibashvili D, Sanikidze T. Еvaluation of the comparative toxicity of various materials for dental prosthetics on cell culture models. Georgian Med News. 2018 Jul-Aug; (280-281): 41-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30204092
29. Huang H, Xu W, Li Z. Application of physical therapy plus massage in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2003; 7: 1223.
30. Hyde TP, Craddock HL, Gray JC, Pavitt SH, Hulme C, Godfrey M, et al. A Randomised Controlled Trial of Complete Denture Impression Materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 42(8): 895-901. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995473. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4119301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.005
31. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Guney U. Investigation of bonding properties of denture bases to siliconebased soft denture liner immersed in isobutyl methacrylate and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6: 121-5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843397. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4024556. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.121
32. Kaplan P. Flexible Partial Denture Variations: The Use of Circumferential, Combination, and Continuous Clasp Designs. Dentistry Today. 2012; 31(10): 138-41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23156641
33. Said MM, Otomaru T, Yeerken Y, Taniguchi H. Masticatory function and oral health-related quality of life in patients after partial maxillectomies with closed or open defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul; 118(1): 108-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28089334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.003
34. Blasiak J, Kasznicki J, Drzewoski J, Pawlowska E, Szczepanska J, Reiter RJ. Perspectives on the use of melatonin to reduce cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of methacrylate-based dental materials. Journal of Pineal Research. 2011; 51(2): 157–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.2011.00877.x
35. Hussain M, Hassan S, Ali S, et al. Quality of Life in Patients after providing removable acrylic partial denture. Pakistan Oral & Dental journal. 2014; 34(3): 64-7.
36. Shuman I. The Hard and Soft Chairside Denture Reline. Dental economics. 2014; 17: 69-73.
37. Sultan J, Memon MR, Kashif N, Kashif M. General complications in patients wearing polymethylmethacrylate heat cure acrylic resin partial removable dental prostheses. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2015; 2(35): 339-42.
38. Sunit Kr, Ramashanker Siddartha, Raghuwar Dayal Singh, Lakshya Kumar, Durga Shanker Gupta, Upadhyaya Snehal Rashmikant. Jurel Prosthetic rehabilitation of patient using immediate complete denture: Immediate complete denture. International Journal of research in dentistry. 2011; 1(Issue 2): 28–34.
39. Hernandez-Santos N, Huppler AR, Peterson AC, Khader SA, McKenna KC, Gaffen SL. Th7 cells confer long-term adaptive immunity to oral mucosal Candida albicans infections. Mucosal Immunol. 2013; 6: 900-10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23250275. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3608691. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2012.128