ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 58 of 61
Up
УЖМБС 2018, 3(5): 311–315
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs03.05.311
Physical training and Sport. Theoretical and methodical aspects of physical education and sport

Features of Students’ Physical Development in the Process of Physical Education

Vypasniak I. P., Vintonyak O. V., Shankovskii A. Z.
Abstract

Nowadays, scientists, researchers and practitioners of physical education and sports note a steady increase in the number of students with physical health disabilities, disorders of the locomotor apparatus, low level of physical fitness because of the environmental problems, poor quality food, and, what is of utmost importance, the decrease in the level of their motor activity. The physical development of student youth is a marker that indirectly characterizes the physical fitness and level of physical health of students. It is closely connected with the process of their organism forming. Even the visual assessment of the student’s body structure gives the researcher an opportunity to approximately determine his/her somatotype, to characterize the level of their motor abilities development, the ratio of the body length and weight, the presence of fatty deposits, the proportionality of body sizes. The systematic analysis of the domestic theory and practice of physical education of different groups of the population indicates that the body structure is one of the characteristics of physical development, which gives the objective understanding of the spatial organization of the morphological components of the human body, the proportions, and constitutional features of the body. According to current attainments, the body structure has distinct sexual, age and individual characteristics, and in terms of the system organization can be regarded as an interrelated and interdependent set of morphofunctional components of the human body. Unfortunately, the researchers state the delay in the physical development of student youth and the increasing of the proportion of students who, due to their state of health, belong to special medical groups in the process of their education in higher education establishments. The purpose of the study was to determine the peculiarities of the physical development of students of the 1-4 years of study at the higher educational establishments with a regard to the type of their body structure in the process of physical education. Material and methods. We used the methods of scientific and methodical literature analysis; pedagogical observation; anthropometry; pedagogical experiment; methods of mathematical statistics. 208 students took part in the research, which was carried out on the basis of the Halytska academy, namely 41 freshmen, 51 sophomores, 63 undergraduates and 53 graduates. Results and discussion. The results of the anthropometric researches received during the pedagogical experiment were processed by statistical methods. The participants of the experiment were distributed according to the body structure in accordance with the PignetIndex. Based on the PignetIndex, the participants in the experiment were divided into students with ectomorphic, mesomorphic, and endomorphic types of body structures. Thus, 16.35% were assigned to the ectomorphic type, 62.02% – to the mesomorphic group, and 21.63% of the surveyed – to the endomorphic type. The study showed that the maximum percentage of boys with normal body weight and body mass ratio among the representatives of the ectomorphic type was 100% for students of the 1st and 4th years of study. Among the participants of the mesomorphic somatotype the largest amount of students with a normal body weight and length ratio was 96.88% of the 4th year students. In the endomorphic type the maximum number of students with a normal ratio of body length and weight, which was 22.22%, was recorded among the 1st year students. Conclusion. The research made it possible to establish that both the anthropometric indices of the surveyed students and the number of students with a normal correlation of body length and weight, depending on the course of study, did not differ significantly (p> 0.05). Prospects for further research lie in the ability to determine the peculiarities of the biogeometric profile of the students’posture, depending on their body structure.

Keywords: students, body structure, physical development, physical education

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 219K

References
  1. Vynnyk NM, Onopriyenko OM. Metody vyznachennya morfofunktsionalnogo rozvytku studentskoyi molodi: metodychni rekomendatsiyi. Cherkasy, 2015. 76 s. [Ukrainian]
  2. Gryban GP, Puzdymir MI, Tkachenko PP. Fizychnyy rozvytok studentiv ta kryteriyi yogo otsinky. Efektivni nastroje modernichved. 2013; 33: 69-74. [Ukrainian]
  3. Kashuba VA. Byomekhanyka osanky. Kyev: Olympyyskaya lyteratura; 2003. 248 s. [Russian]
  4. Kashuba VA, Sergyenko KN. Materyaly I Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-praktycheskoy konferentsyy. Byomekhanyka stopy cheloveka. 2008 yyun 18 19. Grodno, 2008. s. 32-4. [Russian]
  5. Kashuba VA, Golub VP, Rudnytskyy AV. Kharakterystyka byogeometrycheskogo profylya osanky studentok s razlychnym typom teloslozhenyya. Naukovyy chasopys Nats ped un-tu im MP Dragomanova. 2013; 12 (39): 52-9. [Russian]
  6. Kashuba VA, Bondar EM, Goncharova NN, Nosova NL. Formyrovanye motoryky cheloveka v protsesse fyzycheskogo vospytanyya. Lutsk: Vezha-Druk. 2016. 232 s. [Russian]
  7. Kashuba V, Nosova N, Kolomyets T, Kozlov Yu. Kontrol sostoyanyya byogeometrycheskogo profylya osanky cheloveka v protsesse zanyatyy fyzycheskymy uprazhnenyyamy. Sportyv visnyk Prydniprov'ya. 2017; 2: 183–90. [Russian]
  8. Kashuba V. Modern approaches to improving body constitution of female students within physical education classes. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2017; 4: Art 277: 2472–6.