ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
  • 35 of 45
Up
УЖМБС 2018, 3(3): 193–199
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs03.03.193
View of a problem

Methods for Studying the Visual Analyzer Contrast Sensitivity in Children and Adolescents

Kharchenko L. 1, Kadoshnikova I. 1, Plyska O. 1, Shkrobanets I. 2, Lazoryshynets V. 2
Abstract

The purpose of the work is to familiarize practicing doctors with a new way of determining the eyes contrast sensitivity in children in conditions of a school medical office and an outpatient hospital. Materials and methods. This method is a simple screening method for determining eye contrast sensitivity, requiring a minimum time expenditure (less than 1 minute) and allowing to characterize eyes contrast sensitivity with the usual one-dimensional indicator convenient for the oculum, diagnose at early stages a decrease in refraction anomaly and to detect eye pathology in children and adolescents at an early stage, even before the appearance of complaints and clinical manifestation. The definition of contrast sensitivity is a highly informative study for an accurate assessment of the functional state of the visual analyzer. With the help of this study, it is possible to detect minimal disorders of visual functions in diseases of the retina and optic nerve, disorders of the pathways and the central apparatus of the visual analyzer. The standard techniques are deprived of such high sensitivity (when using Sivtsev-Golovin tables or other similar tables), which help measure the eye resolution at the maximum contrast only. This article describes an easy-to-use and available for screening examination method for determining contrast sensitivity using the "Matrix table of contrast optotypes". The authors also proposed an algorithm for examining children of school age in the conditions of a school medical office and in an outpatient hospital. To conduct a survey on the proposed methodology, there is no need to create special conditions, buy expensive equipment and involve specially trained personnel. Application of this technique improves diagnosis of the eye diseases at the earliest stages, which is impossible when using traditional screening methods of examination in the conditions of a school medical office and an outpatient hospital. This fast and inexpensive method, which does not require bulky ophthalmologic equipment, sensitive at early preclinical stages of ophthalmic diseases, can be recommended for inclusion in the list of mandatory screening studies of the visual analyzer in schoolchildren along with the definition of visual acuity. It allows improving early diagnosis and timely treatment of the pathology of the visual analyzer in children and adolescents. Further research in this direction will be aimed at creating an algorithm for determining contrast sensitivity as an early screening method for the early detection of refractive errors, as well as assessing the performance of the visual analyzer in schoolchildren in visual work with various screen information carriers, for valid recommendations on the duration and nature of the visual load among schoolchildren of different ages.

Keywords: vision, contrast sensitivity, children and adolescents

Full text: PDF (Rus) 222K

References
  1. Avetisov SE, Kashchenko TP, Shamshinova AM. Zritelnye funktsii i ikh korrektsiya u detey: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. M, 2005. 872 s. [Russian]
  2. Birich TA, Levshuk LM, Motornyy VV, Fedorov YuG. Opredelenie kontrastnoy chustvitelnosti glaz metodom ekspres-diagnostiki. Meditsinskie novosti. 2007; 4: 79-82. [Russian]
  3. Volkov VV. Metodika klinicheskoy vizokontrastometrii. Vestnik oftalmologii. 1983; 3: 59-61. [Russian]
  4. Murav’eva SV, Pronin SV, Shelepin YuE. Kontrastnaya chuvstvitelnost zritelnoy sistemy cheloveka. Eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya. 2010; 3 (3): 5–20. [Russian]
  5. Nikolyuk AM. Viznachennya kontrastnoyi chutlivosti sitkivki v ranniy diagnostitsi endokrinnoyi oftalmopatiyi. Oftalmologicheskiy zhurnal. 2007; 3: 36-9. [Urrainian]
  6. Novikov SA. K voprosu o standartizatsii i optimizatsii oftalmologicheskogo obsledovaniya patsientov. Sovremennaya optometriya. 2016; 10: 30-7. [Russian]
  7. Rutkovskaya AV, Nechiporenko PA, Ryzhova DV, i dr. Proshloe i nastoyashchee v diagnostike funktsionalnykh rasstroystv zritelnoy sistemy. Sovremennaya optometriya. 2016; 8: 25-35. [Russian]
  8. Takhtaev YuV. Kontrastnaya chuvstvitelnost pri sfericheskikh defokusirovkakh razlichnykh stepeney u patsientov s monofokalnoy i multifokalnoy artifakiey. Oftalmologicheskie vedomosti. 2015; 8 (3): 5-12. [Russian]
  9. Sha N, Deykin S., Anderson R. Sovremennye metodiki izmereniya ostroty zreniya. Sovremennaya optometriya. 2016; 7: 33-40. [Russian]
  10. Shamshinova AM, Volkov VV. Funktsionalnye metody issledovaniya v oftalmologii. M: Meditsina, 1999. 416 s. S 53-6. [Russian]
  11. Shelepin KYu, Pronin SV, Shelepin YuE. Raspoznavanie fragmentirovannykh izobrazheniy i vozniknovenie «insayta». Opticheskiy zhurnal. 2015; 82 (10): 70-1. [Russian]
  12. 12. Patent 9853 Belarus, MPK (2006) A61B 3/02. Sposob opredeleniya kontrastnoy chuvstvitelnosti glaza / Fedorov YuG, Birich TA, Rozenblyum YuZ, Batyan GM, Motornyy VV. (Belarus); zayavilel i vladelec patenta Belorusskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet; Uchrezhdenie obrazovaniya Belorusskiy gosudarstvennyy meditsinskiy universitet (Belarus). № 001-0108; opubl 30.10.07. Byul № 9853 [Russian]
  13. Dennison J, Beatty S, O´Regan G, Nolan D. Impact of macular pigment on visual perfomancе. Оptician. 12.10.12. Available from: http://www.macuhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/visual- performance.pdf
  14. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophtalmol. 2016; 123 (5): 1036-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26875007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006